Commit f1e79c7e authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva Committed by Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200507185408.GA14561@embeddedor
parent 16dc224f
...@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ struct bdb_general_definitions { ...@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ struct bdb_general_definitions {
* number = (block_size - sizeof(bdb_general_definitions))/ * number = (block_size - sizeof(bdb_general_definitions))/
* defs->child_dev_size; * defs->child_dev_size;
*/ */
u8 devices[0]; u8 devices[];
} __packed; } __packed;
/* /*
...@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ struct bdb_mipi_config { ...@@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ struct bdb_mipi_config {
struct bdb_mipi_sequence { struct bdb_mipi_sequence {
u8 version; u8 version;
u8 data[0]; /* up to 6 variable length blocks */ u8 data[]; /* up to 6 variable length blocks */
} __packed; } __packed;
/* /*
......
...@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ struct virtual_engine { ...@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ struct virtual_engine {
/* And finally, which physical engines this virtual engine maps onto. */ /* And finally, which physical engines this virtual engine maps onto. */
unsigned int num_siblings; unsigned int num_siblings;
struct intel_engine_cs *siblings[0]; struct intel_engine_cs *siblings[];
}; };
static struct virtual_engine *to_virtual_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) static struct virtual_engine *to_virtual_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
......
...@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct i915_vma_coredump { ...@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct i915_vma_coredump {
int num_pages; int num_pages;
int page_count; int page_count;
int unused; int unused;
u32 *pages[0]; u32 *pages[];
}; };
struct i915_request_coredump { struct i915_request_coredump {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment