Commit f2913d00 authored by Palmer Dabbelt's avatar Palmer Dabbelt

RISC-V: Avoid dereferening NULL regs in die()

I don't think we can actually die() without a regs pointer, but the
compiler was warning about a NULL check after a dereference.  It seems
prudent to just avoid the possibly-NULL dereference, given that when
die()ing the system is already toast so who knows how we got there.
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarConor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920200037.6727-1-palmer@rivosinc.comSigned-off-by: default avatarPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
parent 1b5964b2
......@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
{
static int die_counter;
int ret;
long cause;
oops_enter();
......@@ -42,11 +43,13 @@ void die(struct pt_regs *regs, const char *str)
pr_emerg("%s [#%d]\n", str, ++die_counter);
print_modules();
show_regs(regs);
if (regs)
show_regs(regs);
ret = notify_die(DIE_OOPS, str, regs, 0, regs->cause, SIGSEGV);
cause = regs ? regs->cause : -1;
ret = notify_die(DIE_OOPS, str, regs, 0, cause, SIGSEGV);
if (regs && kexec_should_crash(current))
if (kexec_should_crash(current))
crash_kexec(regs);
bust_spinlocks(0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment