Commit f4356947 authored by Ido Schimmel's avatar Ido Schimmel Committed by Jakub Kicinski

flow_offload: Reject matching on layer 2 miss

Adjust drivers that support the 'FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META' key to reject
filters that try to match on the newly added layer 2 miss field. Add an
extack message to clearly communicate the failure reason to user space.

The following users were not patched:

1. mtk_flow_offload_replace(): Only checks that the key is present, but
   does not do anything with it.
2. mlx5_tc_ct_set_tuple_match(): Used as part of netfilter offload,
   which does not make use of the new field, unlike tc.
3. get_netdev_from_rule() in nfp: Likewise.

Example:

 # tc filter add dev swp1 egress pref 1 proto all flower skip_sw l2_miss true action drop
 Error: mlxsw_spectrum: Can't match on "l2_miss".
 We have an error talking to the kernel
Acked-by: default avatarElad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent 1a432018
...@@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ static int prestera_flower_parse_meta(struct prestera_acl_rule *rule, ...@@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ static int prestera_flower_parse_meta(struct prestera_acl_rule *rule,
__be16 key, mask; __be16 key, mask;
flow_rule_match_meta(f_rule, &match); flow_rule_match_meta(f_rule, &match);
if (match.mask->l2_miss) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\"");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) { if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack,
"Unsupported ingress ifindex mask"); "Unsupported ingress ifindex mask");
......
...@@ -2587,6 +2587,12 @@ static int mlx5e_flower_parse_meta(struct net_device *filter_dev, ...@@ -2587,6 +2587,12 @@ static int mlx5e_flower_parse_meta(struct net_device *filter_dev,
return 0; return 0;
flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match); flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match);
if (match.mask->l2_miss) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\"");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (!match.mask->ingress_ifindex) if (!match.mask->ingress_ifindex)
return 0; return 0;
......
...@@ -294,6 +294,12 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_flower_parse_meta(struct mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_info *rulei, ...@@ -294,6 +294,12 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_flower_parse_meta(struct mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_info *rulei,
return 0; return 0;
flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match); flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match);
if (match.mask->l2_miss) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\"");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) { if (match.mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Unsupported ingress ifindex mask"); NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(f->common.extack, "Unsupported ingress ifindex mask");
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
......
...@@ -592,6 +592,16 @@ ocelot_flower_parse_key(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, bool ingress, ...@@ -592,6 +592,16 @@ ocelot_flower_parse_key(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, bool ingress,
return -EOPNOTSUPP; return -EOPNOTSUPP;
} }
if (flow_rule_match_key(rule, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META)) {
struct flow_match_meta match;
flow_rule_match_meta(rule, &match);
if (match.mask->l2_miss) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Can't match on \"l2_miss\"");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
}
/* For VCAP ES0 (egress rewriter) we can match on the ingress port */ /* For VCAP ES0 (egress rewriter) we can match on the ingress port */
if (!ingress) { if (!ingress) {
ret = ocelot_flower_parse_indev(ocelot, port, f, filter); ret = ocelot_flower_parse_indev(ocelot, port, f, filter);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment