Commit f531fbb0 authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xadd

[ upstream commit f37a8cb8 ]

Alexei found that verifier does not reject stores into context
via BPF_ST instead of BPF_STX. And while looking at it, we
also should not allow XADD variant of BPF_STX.

The context rewriter is only assuming either BPF_LDX_MEM- or
BPF_STX_MEM-type operations, thus reject anything other than
that so that assumptions in the rewriter properly hold. Add
test cases as well for BPF selftests.

Fixes: d691f9e8 ("bpf: allow programs to write to certain skb fields")
Reported-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 265d7657
...@@ -702,6 +702,13 @@ static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) ...@@ -702,6 +702,13 @@ static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, &env->cur_state.regs[regno]); return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, &env->cur_state.regs[regno]);
} }
static bool is_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
{
const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &env->cur_state.regs[regno];
return reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX;
}
static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off, int size) struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off, int size)
{ {
...@@ -896,6 +903,12 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) ...@@ -896,6 +903,12 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return -EACCES; return -EACCES;
} }
if (is_ctx_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
verbose("BPF_XADD stores into R%d context is not allowed\n",
insn->dst_reg);
return -EACCES;
}
/* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */ /* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */
err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1); BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1);
...@@ -3012,6 +3025,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) ...@@ -3012,6 +3025,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (err) if (err)
return err; return err;
if (is_ctx_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) {
verbose("BPF_ST stores into R%d context is not allowed\n",
insn->dst_reg);
return -EACCES;
}
/* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment