Commit f54c1427 authored by Johannes Berg's avatar Johannes Berg Committed by John W. Linville

rfkill: allow toggling soft state in sysfs again

Apparently there actually _are_ tools that try to set
this in sysfs even though it wasn't supposed to be used
this way without claiming first. Guess what: now that
I've cleaned it all up it doesn't matter and we can
simply allow setting the soft-block state in sysfs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Tested-By: default avatarDarren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
parent e2e414d9
......@@ -648,15 +648,26 @@ static ssize_t rfkill_state_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
/*
* The intention was that userspace can only take control over
* a given device when/if rfkill-input doesn't control it due
* to user_claim. Since user_claim is currently unsupported,
* we never support changing the state from userspace -- this
* can be implemented again later.
*/
struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev);
unsigned long state;
int err;
if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
err = strict_strtoul(buf, 0, &state);
if (err)
return err;
if (state != RFKILL_USER_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED &&
state != RFKILL_USER_STATE_UNBLOCKED)
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex);
rfkill_set_block(rfkill, state == RFKILL_USER_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED);
mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex);
return -EPERM;
return err ?: count;
}
static ssize_t rfkill_claim_show(struct device *dev,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment