Commit f58d6fbc authored by Borislav Petkov (AMD)'s avatar Borislav Petkov (AMD)

x86/CPU/AMD: Fix the DIV(0) initial fix attempt

Initially, it was thought that doing an innocuous division in the #DE
handler would take care to prevent any leaking of old data from the
divider but by the time the fault is raised, the speculation has already
advanced too far and such data could already have been used by younger
operations.

Therefore, do the innocuous division on every exit to userspace so that
userspace doesn't see any potentially old data from integer divisions in
kernel space.

Do the same before VMRUN too, to protect host data from leaking into the
guest too.

Fixes: 77245f1c ("x86/CPU/AMD: Do not leak quotient data after a division by 0")
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230811213824.10025-1-bp@alien8.de
parent ba5ca5e5
......@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static inline void arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs,
static __always_inline void arch_exit_to_user_mode(void)
{
mds_user_clear_cpu_buffers();
amd_clear_divider();
}
#define arch_exit_to_user_mode arch_exit_to_user_mode
......
......@@ -1329,3 +1329,4 @@ void noinstr amd_clear_divider(void)
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("", "div %2\n\t", X86_BUG_DIV0)
:: "a" (0), "d" (0), "r" (1));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_clear_divider);
......@@ -206,8 +206,6 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY(exc_divide_error)
{
do_error_trap(regs, 0, "divide error", X86_TRAP_DE, SIGFPE,
FPE_INTDIV, error_get_trap_addr(regs));
amd_clear_divider();
}
DEFINE_IDTENTRY(exc_overflow)
......
......@@ -4006,6 +4006,8 @@ static noinstr void svm_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool spec_ctrl_in
guest_state_enter_irqoff();
amd_clear_divider();
if (sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm))
__svm_sev_es_vcpu_run(svm, spec_ctrl_intercepted);
else
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment