Commit faf3a932 authored by Florian Fainelli's avatar Florian Fainelli Committed by David S. Miller

net: dsa: Ensure validity of dst->ds[0]

It is perfectly possible to have non zero indexed switches being present
in a DSA switch tree, in such a case, we will be deferencing a NULL
pointer while dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_{setup,restore}. Be more defensive
and ensure that dst->ds[0] is valid before doing anything with it.

Fixes: 0c73c523 ("net: dsa: Initialize CPU port ethtool ops per tree")
Signed-off-by: default avatarFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent d9584d8c
...@@ -394,9 +394,11 @@ static int dsa_dst_apply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst) ...@@ -394,9 +394,11 @@ static int dsa_dst_apply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
return err; return err;
} }
if (dst->ds[0]) {
err = dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_setup(dst->ds[0]); err = dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_setup(dst->ds[0]);
if (err) if (err)
return err; return err;
}
/* If we use a tagging format that doesn't have an ethertype /* If we use a tagging format that doesn't have an ethertype
* field, make sure that all packets from this point on get * field, make sure that all packets from this point on get
...@@ -433,6 +435,7 @@ static void dsa_dst_unapply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst) ...@@ -433,6 +435,7 @@ static void dsa_dst_unapply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
dsa_ds_unapply(dst, ds); dsa_ds_unapply(dst, ds);
} }
if (dst->ds[0])
dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_restore(dst->ds[0]); dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_restore(dst->ds[0]);
pr_info("DSA: tree %d unapplied\n", dst->tree); pr_info("DSA: tree %d unapplied\n", dst->tree);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment