Commit fbfab1ab authored by Abhishek Sahu's avatar Abhishek Sahu Committed by Wolfram Sang

i2c: qup: reorganization of driver code to remove polling for qup v1

Following are the major issues in current driver code

1. The current driver simply assumes the transfer completion
   whenever its gets any non-error interrupts and then simply do the
   polling of available/free bytes in FIFO.
2. The block mode is not working properly since no handling in
   being done for OUT_BLOCK_WRITE_REQ and IN_BLOCK_READ_REQ.

Because of above, i2c v1 transfers of size greater than 32 are failing
with following error message

	i2c_qup 78b6000.i2c: timeout for fifo out full

To make block mode working properly and move to use the interrupts
instead of polling, major code reorganization is required. Following
are the major changes done in this patch

1. Remove the polling of TX FIFO free space and RX FIFO available
   bytes and move to interrupts completely. QUP has QUP_MX_OUTPUT_DONE,
   QUP_MX_INPUT_DONE, OUT_BLOCK_WRITE_REQ and IN_BLOCK_READ_REQ
   interrupts to handle FIFO’s properly so check all these interrupts.
2. During write, For FIFO mode, TX FIFO can be directly written
   without checking for FIFO space. For block mode, the QUP will generate
   OUT_BLOCK_WRITE_REQ interrupt whenever it has block size of available
   space.
3. During read, both TX and RX FIFO will be used. TX will be used
   for writing tags and RX will be used for receiving the data. In QUP,
   TX and RX can operate in separate mode so configure modes accordingly.
4. For read FIFO mode, wait for QUP_MX_INPUT_DONE interrupt which
   will be generated after all the bytes have been copied in RX FIFO. For
   read Block mode, QUP will generate IN_BLOCK_READ_REQ interrupts
   whenever it has block size of available data.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAbhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
parent f7714b4e
This diff is collapsed.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment