Commit fd875dca authored by Mike Kravetz's avatar Mike Kravetz Committed by Linus Torvalds

hugetlbfs: fix potential over/underflow setting node specific nr_hugepages

The number of node specific huge pages can be set via a file such as:
/sys/devices/system/node/node1/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
When a node specific value is specified, the global number of huge pages
must also be adjusted.  This adjustment is calculated as the specified
node specific value + (global value - current node value).  If the node
specific value provided by the user is large enough, this calculation
could overflow an unsigned long leading to a smaller than expected number
of huge pages.

To fix, check the calculation for overflow.  If overflow is detected, use
ULONG_MAX as the requested value.  This is inline with the user request to
allocate as many huge pages as possible.

It was also noticed that the above calculation was done outside the
hugetlb_lock.  Therefore, the values could be inconsistent and result in
underflow.  To fix, the calculation is moved within the routine
set_max_huge_pages() where the lock is held.

In addition, the code in __nr_hugepages_store_common() which tries to
handle the case of not being able to allocate a node mask would likely
result in incorrect behavior.  Luckily, it is very unlikely we will ever
take this path.  If we do, simply return ENOMEM.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190328220533.19884-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reported-by: default avatarJing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Alex Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 299c83dc
......@@ -2288,13 +2288,33 @@ static int adjust_pool_surplus(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
}
#define persistent_huge_pages(h) (h->nr_huge_pages - h->surplus_huge_pages)
static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
{
unsigned long min_count, ret;
spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
/*
* Check for a node specific request.
* Changing node specific huge page count may require a corresponding
* change to the global count. In any case, the passed node mask
* (nodes_allowed) will restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
*/
if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
unsigned long old_count = count;
count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
/*
* User may have specified a large count value which caused the
* above calculation to overflow. In this case, they wanted
* to allocate as many huge pages as possible. Set count to
* largest possible value to align with their intention.
*/
if (count < old_count)
count = ULONG_MAX;
}
/*
* Gigantic pages runtime allocation depend on the capability for large
* page range allocation.
......@@ -2446,15 +2466,22 @@ static ssize_t __nr_hugepages_store_common(bool obey_mempolicy,
}
} else if (nodes_allowed) {
/*
* per node hstate attribute: adjust count to global,
* but restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
* Node specific request. count adjustment happens in
* set_max_huge_pages() after acquiring hugetlb_lock.
*/
count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
init_nodemask_of_node(nodes_allowed, nid);
} else
nodes_allowed = &node_states[N_MEMORY];
} else {
/*
* Node specific request, but we could not allocate the few
* words required for a node mask. We are unlikely to hit
* this condition. Since we can not pass down the appropriate
* node mask, just return ENOMEM.
*/
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
err = set_max_huge_pages(h, count, nodes_allowed);
err = set_max_huge_pages(h, count, nid, nodes_allowed);
out:
if (nodes_allowed != &node_states[N_MEMORY])
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment