uml: track and make up lost ticks
Alarm delivery could be noticably late in the !CONFIG_NOHZ case because lost ticks weren't being taken into account. This is now treated more carefully, with the time between ticks being calculated and the appropriate number of ticks delivered to the timekeeping system. Cc: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment