- 12 Oct, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Tao Zhou authored
Same as navi series. Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Tao Zhou authored
Use direct load for dimgrey_cavefish. Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Tao Zhou authored
Load gpu info firmware for dimgrey_cavefish. Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Tao Zhou authored
Add chip type for dimgrey_cavefish. Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Rodrigo Siqueira authored
It was recently introduced a change that enables driver to disable streams if pixel clock changes. Consequently, the code path executed in the disable vbios function expanded to an encoder verification part. The encoder loop is nested inside the pipe count loop, and both loops share the 'i' variable in control of their flow. This situation may lead to an infinite loop because the encoder loop constantly updates the `i` variable, making the first loop always positive. As a result, we can see a soft hang during the module load (modprobe amdgpu) and a series of dmesg log that looks like this: kernel:[ 124.538727] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [modprobe:1000] RSP: 0018:ffffabbf419bf0e8 EFLAGS: 00000282 RAX: ffffffffc0809de0 RBX: ffff93b35ccc0000 RCX: ffff93b366c21800 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000141 RDI: ffff93b35ccc0000 RBP: ffffabbf419bf108 R08: ffffabbf419bf164 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 0000000008677d40 R13: 0000000000000141 R14: ffff93b35cfc0000 R15: ffff93b35abc0000 FS: 00007f1400717540(0000) GS:ffff93b37f680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005649b66b0968 CR3: 00000003e0fec000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: amdgpu_device_rreg+0x17/0x20 [amdgpu] amdgpu_cgs_read_register+0x14/0x20 [amdgpu] dm_read_reg_func+0x3a/0xb0 [amdgpu] get_pixel_clk_frequency_100hz+0x30/0x50 [amdgpu] dc_commit_state+0x8f1/0xae0 [amdgpu] ? drm_calc_timestamping_constants+0x101/0x160 [drm] amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0x39d/0x21a0 [amdgpu] ? dcn21_validate_bandwidth+0xe5/0x290 [amdgpu] ? kfree+0xc3/0x390 ? dcn21_validate_bandwidth+0xe5/0x290 [amdgpu] ... RSP: 002b:00007fff26009bd8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055a8025bea50 RCX: 00007f140085c89d RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000055a8025b8290 RDI: 000000000000000c RBP: 0000000000040000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 000000000000000c R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055a8025b8290 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055a8025bead0 R15: 000055a8025bea50 This issue was fixed by introducing a second variable for the internal loop. Fixes: 8353d30e ("drm/amd/display: disable stream if pixel clock changed with link active") Reviewed-by: Roman Li <Roman.Li@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Bhawanpreet Lakha authored
These function pointers are missing from dcn30_init .calc_vupdate_position : Used to help avoid cursor stuttering .set_pipe : Needed for setting ABM So add them Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 09 Oct, 2020 22 commits
-
-
Ye Bin authored
Fix follow warning: [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.c:249]: (warning) %d in format string (no. 1) requires 'int' but the argument type is 'unsigned int'. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Ye Bin authored
Fix follow warning: Checking drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c... [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:770]: (error) Invalid number of character '{' when these macros are defined: ''. Checking drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c: CONFIG_ACPI... [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:770]: (error) Invalid number of character '{' when these macros are defined: 'CONFIG_ACPI'. ...... Checking drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c: CONFIG_X86... [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:770]: (error) Invalid number of character '{' when these macros are defined: 'CONFIG_X86'. Checking drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c: _X86_... [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:770]: (error) Invalid number of character '{' when these macros are defined: '_X86_'. Checking drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c: __linux__... [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acpi.c:770]: (error) Invalid number of character '{' when these macros are defined: '__linux__'. Fixes: 97d798b2 ("drm/amdgpu: simplify ATIF backlight handling") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Alex Deucher authored
These were leftover from the initial implementation, but never used. Drop them. Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Noticed-by: Ryan Taylor <ryan.taylor@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Evan Quan authored
As the dpm clock table is needed during DC HW initialization. And that (DC HW initialization) comes before smu_late_init() where current APU dpm clock table setup is performed. So, NULL pointer dereference will be triggered. By moving APU dpm clock table setup to smu_hw_init(), this can be avoided. Fixes: 02cf91c1 ("drm/amd/powerplay: postpone operations not required for hw setup to late_init") Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Reported-by: Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net> Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Changfeng authored
It needs to use adev->pg_flags other than adev->cg_glags in gfx_v10_cntl_power_gating Signed-off-by: Changfeng <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Emily.Deng authored
Remove the virtual_display warning in drm_crtc_vblank_off when dev->num_crtcs is null. Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Emily.Deng <Emily.Deng@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
kernel test robot authored
Fixes: c7651b73 ("drm/amdgpu: Fix handling of KFD initialization failures") Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
Make use of the new struct_size() helper instead of the offsetof() idiom. Also, use kmalloc() instead of kcalloc(). v2: squash in kzalloc fix Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
Make use of the new struct_size() helper instead of the offsetof() idiom. Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_ppt_v1_pcie_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7db0bc.7Xivn4K83f7XW0ug%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_ppt_v1_voltage_lookup_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61df.jWrFfnjxGbjSkPOp%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_table There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61e2.qiTVTyG2pVoG8bb0%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_table There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433c.TTk9rnA+F58kyDUy%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table) when it should have been multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3a.ryM4GmZr3e0JeZy+%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_cac_leakage_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_table) when it should have been multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d38.iT%2FQTjN+659XUDo5%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table) when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d35.pJToGs3H9khZK6ws%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying ptable->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table) when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d36.6PStUZp2HRxAz7IM%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table) when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3c.TyfOhg%2FA6JycL6ZN%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table) when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433e.pXkC6KsN6HN%2FLdhj%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_clock_array, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433f.ZyMD+YUIVAwiHGVe%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Use a flexible-array member in struct vi_dpm_table instead of a one-element array. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433c.TTk9rnA+F58kyDUy%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arraysBuild-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c295c.8iqp1Ifc6oiVDq%2F%2F%25lkp@intel.com/Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
- 07 Oct, 2020 12 commits
-
-
Thong Thai authored
Enable Green_Sardine VCN support and VCN firmware loading v2: use apu flags Signed-off-by: Thong Thai <thong.thai@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Aaron Liu authored
This patch enable green_sardine_asd.bin loading. v2: use apu flags Signed-off-by: Aaron Liu <aaron.liu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Prike Liang authored
Initialize the SDMA IP for green_sardine. v2: use apu flags Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Prike Liang authored
Enable the gfx base HW function of green_sardine. v2: use apu flags Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Prike Liang authored
This patch adds common ip support for green_sardine. v2: use apu flags, squash in CG/PG enablement v3: rebase Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Prike Liang authored
This patch adds green_sardine support for gpu_info firmware and ip block setting. v2: use apu flag Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Alex Deucher authored
Will be used for Green_Sardine which is a new APU. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Alex Deucher authored
The default auto setting for kcq should not generate a warning. Fixes: a300de40 ("drm/amdgpu: introduce a new parameter to configure how many KCQ we want(v5)") Reviewed-by: Kent Russell <kent.russell@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Alex Deucher authored
We want to use the dev_* functions here rather than the pr_* variants. Switch to using dev_warn() which mirrors what we do on other asics. Fixes the following build errors on ARC: ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/navi10_ppt.c: In function 'navi10_fill_i2c_req': ../arch/arc/include/asm/bug.h:24:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pr_warn'; did you mean 'drm_warn'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/sienna_cichlid_ppt.c: In function 'sienna_cichlid_fill_i2c_req': ../arch/arc/include/asm/bug.h:24:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pr_warn'; did you mean 'drm_warn'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Jonathan Kim authored
Add xgmi perfmons for Arcturus. v4: Align with patch 2 with struct improvements v3: Align with patch 2 streamlining perf types versus event config types. v2: Resend for re-review with alignment for v3 in patch 2. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com> Tested-by: Chris Freehill <chris.freehill@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <harish.kasiviswanathan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Jonathan Kim authored
Non-outbound data metrics are non useful so mark them as legacy. Bucket new perf counters into device and not device ip. Bind events to chip instead of IP. Report available event counters and not number of hw counter banks. Move DF public macros to private since not needed outside of IP version. v5: cleanup by moving per chip configs into structs v4: After more discussion, replace *_LEGACY references with IP references to indicate concept of pmu-typed versus event-config-typed event registration. v3: attr groups const array is global but attr groups are allocated per device which doesn't work and causes problems on memory allocation and de-allocation for pmu unregister. Switch to building const attr groups per pmu instead to simplify solution. v2: add comments on sysfs structure and formatting. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <harish.kasiviswanathan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-
Jonathan Kim authored
Mapping hw counters per event config will cause ABA problems so map per event instead. v2: Discontinue starting perf counters if add fails. Make it clear what's happening with pmc_start. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan <harish.kasiviswanathan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-