bch2_journal_res_get() in nonblocking mode is equivalent to a trylock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

There was a race where the src pin would be flushed - releasing the last
pin on that sequence number - before adding the new journal pin. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Can't take read locks on btree nodes while holding
btree_interior_update_lock. Also, fix a bug where we were leaking
journal prereservations.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This should fix an issue where the rebalance thread was spinning
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Not legal to block on a journal prereservation with btree locks held.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This assertion was passing the wrong btree node type when inserting into
interior nodes.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

btree_update_nodes_written() was leaking a btree node lock on failure to
get a journal reservation.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

We were calling bch2_extent_can_insert() incorrectly; it should only be
called when the extents-to-keys pass is running because that's when we
could be splitting a compressed extent. Calling bch2_extent_can_insert()
without passing in a disk reservation was causing a null ptr deref.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This will help with iterator overflow bugs.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This was another bug because of bch2_btree_iter_set_pos() invalidating
iterators.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

We weren't journalling updates done while splitting/compacting nodes -
oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Extent btrees no longer have weird special behaviour for min_key.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Dropping the wrong kind of lock can't lead to anything good...
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

It wasn't updated for the patch that switched inodes to using the offset
field of struct bkey.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

bch2_btree_iter_set_pos() invalidates the key returned by peek().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

When initial btree gc was changed to overlay journal keys as it walks
the btree, it also stopped checking btree topology.

Previously, checking btree topology was a fairly complicated affair -
but it's much easier now that btree_ptr_v2 has min_key in the pointer.

This rewrites the old range_checks code and uses it in both runtime and
initial gc.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This fixes a lockdep splat - allocating memory can call
bch2_clear_page_bits() which takes mark_lock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This is so we don't overflow MAX_LOCK_DEPTH.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Previously, BTREE_ID_INODES was special - inodes were indexed by the
inode field, which meant the offset field of struct bpos wasn't used,
which led to special cases in e.g. the btree iterator code.

Now, inodes in the inodes btree are indexed by the offset field.

Also: prevously min_key was special for extents btrees, min_key for
extents would equal max_key for the previous node. Now, min_key =
bkey_successor() of the previous node, same as non extent btrees.

This means we can completely get rid of
btree_type_sucessor/predecessor.

Also make some improvements to the metadata IO validate/compat code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This has popped and thus needs to be debugged, but the assertion firing
isn't necessarily fatal so switch it to a warning.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This fixes an issue where mounting would fail because of memory
fragmentation - previously the compression bounce buffers were using
get_free_pages().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

The locking was wrong, and we could get a use after free in the error
path where we weren't taking the entrie being freed off the unwritten
list.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

vmalloc allocations don't always obey GFP_NOFS - memalloc_nofs_save() is
the prefered approach for the future.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Seeing the extents that were overlapping is highly useful for figuring
out what went wrong.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This will be used by the userspace debug tools.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Previously, the btree has always been self contained and internally
consistent on disk without anything from the journal - the journal just
contained pointers to the btree roots.

However, this meant that btree node split or compact operations - i.e.
anything that changes btree node topology and involves updates to
interior nodes - would require that interior btree node to be written
immediately, which means emitting a btree node write that's mostly empty
(using 4k of space on disk if the filesystemm blocksize is 4k to only
write perhaps ~100 bytes of new keys).

More importantly, this meant most btree node writes had to be FUA, and
consumer drives have a history of slow and/or buggy FUA support - other
filesystes have been bit by this.

This patch changes the interior btree update path to journal updates to
interior nodes, after the writes for the new btree nodes have completed.
Best of all, it turns out to simplify the interior node update path
somewhat.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This slightly modifies the journal replay code so that it can replay
updates to interior nodes.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This will be needed for the upcoming patches to journal updates to
interior btree nodes.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Extent merging is currently broken, and will be reimplemented
differently soon - right now it only happens when btree nodes are being
compacted, which makes it difficult to test.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This works around a btree locking issue - we can't be holding read locks
while taking write locks, which currently means we can't have live
iterators holding read locks at commit time.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This fixes a transaction iterator overflow.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

We were incorrectly not restarting the transaction when re-traversing
iterators.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Internal writes (i.e. copygc/rebalance operations) shouldn't be blocking
on the allocator when we're going RO.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

The patch "bcachefs: Move extent overwrite handling out of core btree
code" should have been flipping on this feature bit; extent btree nodes
in the old format have to be rewritten before we can insert into them
with the new extent update path. Not turning on this feature bit was
causing us to go into an infinite loop where we keep rewriting btree
nodes over and over.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>