1. 14 Aug, 2010 2 commits
    • Wey-Yi Guy's avatar
      iwlwifi: use long monitor timer to avoid un-necessary reload · 3198c68c
      Wey-Yi Guy authored
      For 5000 and 6000g2b series of devices, use long monitor timer to check
      stuck tx queues.
      
      .6000g2b series device, it is WiFi/BT combo device, there are some cases,
      tx queues are not move for a period of time because the WiFi/BT coex.
      
      .5000 series device, it is being reported firmware got reload more
      often than necessary, so extend the timer to avoid un-necessary reload.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
      3198c68c
    • Wey-Yi Guy's avatar
      iwlwifi: long monitor timer · ce60659a
      Wey-Yi Guy authored
      Change the name for monitor timer, also adding define for long monitor
      timer; long monitor timer can be used for the type of devices require longer
      time to determine the uCode is stuck on tx and needed reload.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
      ce60659a
  2. 13 Aug, 2010 4 commits
  3. 11 Aug, 2010 2 commits
    • Rajkumar Manoharan's avatar
      ath9k_htc: fix panic on packet injection using airbase-ng tool. · da93f106
      Rajkumar Manoharan authored
      This should fix the oops which occurs during the packet injection
      on monitor interface.
      
      EIP is at ath9k_htc_tx_start+0x69/0x220 [ath9k_htc]
       [<f84dc8ea>] ? invoke_tx_handlers+0xa5a/0xee0 [mac80211]
       [<f82c84f4>] ? ath9k_htc_tx+0x44/0xe0 [ath9k_htc]
       [<f84db7b8>] ? __ieee80211_tx+0xf8/0x190 [mac80211]
       [<f84dce0d>] ? ieee80211_tx+0x9d/0x1a0 [mac80211]
       [<f84dcfac>] ? ieee80211_xmit+0x9c/0x1c0 [mac80211]
       [<f84dd1b5>] ? ieee80211_monitor_start_xmit+0x85/0xb0 [mac80211]
       [<c04c30cd>] ? dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1ad/0x210
       [<c04b97c2>] ? __alloc_skb+0x52/0x130
       [<c04d7cd5>] ? sch_direct_xmit+0x105/0x170
       [<c04c5e9f>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0x37f/0x4b0
       [<c0567e1e>] ? packet_snd+0x21e/0x250
       [<c05684a2>] ? packet_sendmsg+0x32/0x40
       [<c04b4c63>] ? sock_aio_write+0x113/0x130
       [<c0207934>] ? do_sync_write+0xc4/0x100
       [<c0167740>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
       [<c02f4414>] ? security_file_permission+0x14/0x20
       [<c0207ad4>] ? rw_verify_area+0x64/0xe0
       [<c01e6458>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x338/0x390
       [<c0207cd5>] ? vfs_write+0x185/0x1a0
       [<c058db20>] ? do_page_fault+0x160/0x3a0
       [<c0208512>] ? sys_write+0x42/0x70
       [<c01033ec>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRajkumar Manoharan <rmanoharan@atheros.com>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      da93f106
    • John W. Linville's avatar
      ipw2100: register pm_qos request before registering pci driver · 2f81b471
      John W. Linville authored
      It is necessary to call pm_qos_add_request prior to calling
      pm_qos_update_request.  It was revealed that ipw2100 has been
      doing this wrong since "pm_qos: Get rid of the allocation in
      pm_qos_add_request()" (commit 82f68251)
      added a WARN that results in the following backtrace:
      
      WARNING: at kernel/pm_qos_params.c:264 pm_qos_update_request+0x5e/0x70()
      pm_qos_update_request() called for unknown object
      Call Trace:
      [<c1024088>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xb0
      [<c1041c9e>] ? pm_qos_update_request+0x5e/0x70
      [<c1041c9e>] ? pm_qos_update_request+0x5e/0x70
      [<c1024153>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40
      [<c1041c9e>] ? pm_qos_update_request+0x5e/0x70
      [<f89fe15f>] ? ipw2100_up+0x3f/0xf10 [ipw2100]
      [<c11961c9>] ? vsnprintf+0xc9/0x530
      [<f89ff36c>] ? ipw2100_net_init+0x2c/0x1c0 [ipw2100]
      [<c12f542d>] ? register_netdevice+0x7d/0x3c0
      [<f89f9b00>] ? ipw2100_irq_tasklet+0x910/0x9a0 [ipw2100]
      [<c12f579f>] ? register_netdev+0x2f/0x40
      [<f89fd471>] ? ipw2100_pci_init_one+0xd21/0x1060 [ipw2100]
      [<c11a5ebb>] ? local_pci_probe+0xb/0x10
      [<c11a6d49>] ? pci_device_probe+0x69/0x90
      [<c1224704>] ? driver_probe_device+0x74/0x180
      [<c10dd15a>] ? sysfs_create_dir+0x6a/0xb0
      [<c1224889>] ? __driver_attach+0x79/0x80
      [<c1224810>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x80
      [<c1223fa2>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x52/0x80
      [<c1224586>] ? driver_attach+0x16/0x20
      [<c1224810>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x80
      [<c122395f>] ? bus_add_driver+0x17f/0x250
      [<c11a5ec0>] ? pci_device_shutdown+0x0/0x20
      [<c11a6c80>] ? pci_device_remove+0x0/0x40
      [<c1224b13>] ? driver_register+0x63/0x120
      [<c11a6f96>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x36/0xa0
      [<f84f9048>] ? ipw2100_init+0x48/0x67 [ipw2100]
      [<c1001122>] ? do_one_initcall+0x32/0x170
      [<c1087078>] ? __vunmap+0xb8/0xf0
      [<f84f9000>] ? ipw2100_init+0x0/0x67 [ipw2100]
      [<c10510c1>] ? sys_init_module+0x161/0x1000
      [<c108f847>] ? sys_close+0x67/0xe0
      [<c13647c1>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
      
      This patch moves pm_qos_add_request prior to pci_register_driver in
      ipw2100 in order to avoid this problem.
      Reported-by: default avatarChristoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      2f81b471
  4. 10 Aug, 2010 5 commits
  5. 09 Aug, 2010 8 commits
  6. 08 Aug, 2010 7 commits
  7. 06 Aug, 2010 3 commits
  8. 05 Aug, 2010 9 commits