Commits · 51b4cb4f3e2265cf8303ffd9a4f239ee3805d3ca · Kirill Smelkov / linux

28 Oct, 2023 33 commits

block: WARN_ON_ONCE() when we remove active partitions · 51b4cb4f

Christian Brauner authored Oct 17, 2023

The logic for disk->open_partitions is:

blkdev_get_by_*()
-> bdev_is_partition()
   -> blkdev_get_part()
      -> blkdev_get_whole() // bdev_whole->bd_openers++
      -> if (part->bd_openers == 0)
                 disk->open_partitions++
         part->bd_openers

In other words, when we first claim/open a partition we increment
disk->open_partitions and only when all part->bd_openers are closed will
disk->open_partitions be zero. That should mean that
disk->open_partitions is always > 0 as long as there's anyone that
has an open partition.

So the check for disk->open_partitions should mean that we can never
remove an active partition that has a holder and holder ops set. Assert
that in the code. The main disk isn't removed so that check doesn't work
for disk->part0 which is what we want. After all we only care about
partition not about the main disk.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017184823.1383356-3-hch@lst.deReviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

51b4cb4f

block: simplify bdev_del_partition() · c30b9787

Christian Brauner authored Oct 17, 2023

BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION refuses to delete partitions that still have
openers, i.e., that has an elevated @bdev->bd_openers count. If a device
is claimed by setting @bdev->bd_holder and @bdev->bd_holder_ops
@bdev->bd_openers and @bdev->bd_holders are incremented.
@bdev->bd_openers is effectively guaranteed to be >= @bdev->bd_holders.
So as long as @bdev->bd_openers isn't zero we know that this partition
is still in active use and that there might still be @bdev->bd_holder
and @bdev->bd_holder_ops set.

The only current example is @fs_holder_ops for filesystems. But that
means bdev_mark_dead() which calls into
bdev->bd_holder_ops->mark_dead::fs_bdev_mark_dead() is a nop. As long as
there's an elevated @bdev->bd_openers count we can't delete the
partition and if there isn't an elevated @bdev->bd_openers count then
there's no @bdev->bd_holder or @bdev->bd_holder_ops.

So simply open-code what we need to do. This gets rid of one more
instance where we acquire s_umount under @disk->open_mutex.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016-fototermin-umriss-59f1ea6c1fe6@braunerReviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017184823.1383356-2-hch@lst.deReviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

c30b9787

fs: Avoid grabbing sb->s_umount under bdev->bd_holder_lock · fd146410

Jan Kara authored Oct 18, 2023

The implementation of bdev holder operations such as fs_bdev_mark_dead()
and fs_bdev_sync() grab sb->s_umount semaphore under
bdev->bd_holder_lock. This is problematic because it leads to
disk->open_mutex -> sb->s_umount lock ordering which is counterintuitive
(usually we grab higher level (e.g. filesystem) locks first and lower
level (e.g. block layer) locks later) and indeed makes lockdep complain
about possible locking cycles whenever we open a block device while
holding sb->s_umount semaphore. Implement a function
bdev_super_lock_shared() which safely transitions from holding
bdev->bd_holder_lock to holding sb->s_umount on alive superblock without
introducing the problematic lock dependency. We use this function
fs_bdev_sync() and fs_bdev_mark_dead().
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018152924.3858-1-jack@suse.cz
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017184823.1383356-1-hch@lst.deReviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

fd146410

jfs: fix log->bdev_handle null ptr deref in lbmStartIO · 6306ff39

Lizhi Xu authored Oct 09, 2023

When sbi->flag is JFS_NOINTEGRITY in lmLogOpen(), log->bdev_handle can't
be inited, so it value will be NULL.
Therefore, add the "log ->no_integrity=1" judgment in lbmStartIO() to avoid such
problems.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+23bc20037854bb335d59@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009094557.1398920-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.comReviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

6306ff39

bcache: Fixup error handling in register_cache() · b3856da7

Jan Kara authored Oct 04, 2023

Coverity has noticed that the printing of error message in
register_cache() uses already freed bdev_handle to get to bdev. In fact
the problem has been there even before commit "bcache: Convert to
bdev_open_by_path()" just a bit more subtle one - cache object itself
could have been freed by the time we looked at ca->bdev and we don't
hold any reference to bdev either so even that could in principle go
away (due to device unplug or similar). Fix all these problems by
printing the error message before closing the bdev.

Fixes: dc893f51d24a ("bcache: Convert to bdev_open_by_path()")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231004093757.11560-1-jack@suse.czAsked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>