- 22 Oct, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Kent Overstreet authored
If a btree node merger is followed by a split or compact of the parent node, we could end up with the parent btree node iterator pointing to the whiteout inserted by the btree node merge operation - the fix is to ensure that interior btree node iterators always point to the first non whiteout. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
With erasure coding, we now have processes in the background that compact data, causing it to take up less space on disk than when it was written, or potentially when it was read. This means that we can't trust the page cache when it says "we have data on disk taking up x amount of space here" - there's always the potential to race with background compaction. To fix this, just check if we need to add to our disk reservation in the bch2_extent_update() path, in the transaction that will do the btree update. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This is needed to fix a bug where we're overflowing iterators within a btree transaction, because we're updating the stripes btree (to update block counts) and the stripes btree trigger is unnecessarily updating the alloc btree - it doesn't need to update the alloc btree when the pointers within a stripe aren't changing. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The stripe creation path was too state-machiney: it would always run the full state machine until it had succesfully created a new stripe. But if we tried to get and reuse an existing stripe after we'd already allocated some buckets, the buckets we'd allocated might have conflicted with the blocks in the existing stripe we need to keep - oops. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Also, print out more information on btree transaction iterator overflow. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
When we didn't find a key to delete we were getting a null ptr deref. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Metadata corruption bugs are hard to debug if we can't see exactly what went wrong - try to allocate a bigger buffer so we can print out everything we have. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Without checking if we actually flushed anything, journal reclaim could still go into an infinite loop while trying ot shut down. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Had a type that meant we were triggering journal reclaim _much_ more aggressively than needed. Also, fix a potential integer overflow. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
- Try to always keep 1/8th of the journal free, on top of pre-reservations - Move the check for whether the journal is stuck to bch2_journal_space_available, and make it only fire when there aren't any journal writes in flight (that might free up space by updating last_seq) Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This patch adds a flag to journal entries which, if set, indicates that they weren't done as flush/fua writes. - non flush/fua journal writes don't update last_seq (i.e. they don't free up space in the journal), thus the journal free space calculations now check whether nonflush journal writes are currently allowed (i.e. are we low on free space, or would doing a flush write free up a lot of space in the journal) - write_delay_ms, the user configurable option for when open journal entries are automatically written, is now interpreted as the max delay between flush journal writes (default 1 second). - bch2_journal_flush_seq_async is changed to ensure a flush write >= the requested sequence number has happened - journal read/replay must now ignore, and blacklist, any journal entries newer than the most recent flush entry in the journal. Also, the way the read_entire_journal option is handled has been improved; struct journal_replay now has an entry, 'ignore', for entries that were read but should not be used. - assorted refactoring and improvements related to journal read in journal_io.c and recovery.c Previously, we'd have to issue a flush/fua write every time we accumulated a full journal entry - typically the bucket size. Now we need to issue them much less frequently: when an fsync is requested, or it's been more than write_delay_ms since the last flush, or when we need to free up space in the journal. This is a significant performance improvement on many write heavy workloads. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This patch increases the maximum journal buffers in flight from 2 to 4 - this will be particularly helpful when in the future we stop requiring flush+fua for every journal write. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
If we have an error in the btree interior update path that prevents us from journalling the update, we can't issue the corresponding btree node write - we didn't get a journal sequence number that would cause it to be ignored in recovery. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
If the journal is halted, journal reclaim won't necessarily be able to make any forward progress, and won't accomplish anything anyways - we should bail out so that we don't get stuck looping in reclaim when the caches are too dirty and we should be shutting down. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
On write error, the vfs inode's i_size may be inconsistent with the btree inode's i_size - flag this so we don't have spurious assertions. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
it's useful to know whether an error was for a read or a write - this also standardizes error messages a bit more. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Various filesystem usage counters are kept in percpu counters, with one set per in flight journal buffer. Right now all the code that deals with it assumes that there's only two buffers/sets of counters, but the number of journal bufs is getting increased to 4 in the next patch - so refactor that code to not assume a constant. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
These only come up when building in userspace, for some reason. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The error check was inverted - leading fsyncs to get stuck and hang, oops. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Since we now always preallocate the maximum number of iterators when we initialize a btree transaction, getting an iterator never fails - we can delete a fair amount of error path code. This patch also simplifies the iterator allocation code a bit. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This way, these tests can be used with tests that inject IO errors and shut down the filesystem. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This deletes some duplicated code. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Introducing the journal+btree iter introduced a regression where we stopped using BTREE_ITER_PREFETCH - this is a performance regression on rotating disks. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
For the new nodes an interior btree update makes reachable, updates to those nodes may be journalled after the btree update starts but before the transactional part - where we make those nodes reachable. Those updates need to be kept in the journal until after the btree update completes, hence we should always get a journal pin at the start of the interior update. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
In the btree key cache code, failing to flush a dirty key is a serious error, but it doesn't need to be a BUG_ON(), we can stop the filesystem instead. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The rhashtable code doesn't like when we destroy an rhashtable that was never initialized Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
We can't run journal reclaim until we've finished replaying updates to interior btree nodes - the check for this was in the wrong place though, leading to journal reclaim spinning before it was allowed to proceed. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
We were incorrectly ignoring the return value of __readahead_batch, leading to a null ptr deref in __bch2_page_state_create(). Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Avoid taking the journal lock if we don't have to. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The interior btree node update path has changed, this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This helps reduce stack usage by avoiding multiple btree_trans on the stack. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
fsck doesn't know about the btree key cache, and non-cached iterators aren't cache coherent (yet?) Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
bch2_bucket_alloc() requires rcu_read_lock() to be held. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This is to make tracing easier. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This is needed to ensure we don't deadlock because journal reclaim and thus memory reclaim isn't making forward progress. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Memory reclaim requires journal reclaim to make forward progress - it's what cleans our caches - thus, while we're in journal reclaim or holding the journal reclaim lock we can't recurse into memory reclaim. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The transaction restart path traverses all iterators, we don't need to do it here. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-