1. 11 Jun, 2013 1 commit
    • Jaegeuk Kim's avatar
      f2fs: support xattr security labels · 8ae8f162
      Jaegeuk Kim authored
      This patch adds the support of security labels for f2fs, which will be used
      by Linus Security Models (LSMs).
      
      Quote from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Security_Modules:
      "Linux Security Modules (LSM) is a framework that allows the Linux kernel to
      support a variety of computer security models while avoiding favoritism toward
      any single security implementation. The framework is licensed under the terms of
      the GNU General Public License and is standard part of the Linux kernel since
      Linux 2.6. AppArmor, SELinux, Smack and TOMOYO Linux are the currently accepted
      modules in the official kernel.".
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      8ae8f162
  2. 07 Jun, 2013 1 commit
    • Jaegeuk Kim's avatar
      f2fs: fix iget/iput of dir during recovery · 5deb8267
      Jaegeuk Kim authored
      It is possible that iput is skipped after iget during the recovery.
      
      In recover_dentry(),
       dir = f2fs_iget();
       ...
       if (de && inode->i_ino == le32_to_cpu(de->ino))
      	goto out;
      
      In this case, this dir is not able to be added in dirty_dir_inode_list.
      The actual linking is done only when set_page_dirty() is called.
      
      So let's add this newly got inode into the list explicitly, and put it at the
      end of the recovery routine.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      5deb8267
  3. 06 Jun, 2013 1 commit
    • Namjae Jeon's avatar
      f2fs: reorganise the function get_victim_by_default · b2b3460a
      Namjae Jeon authored
      Fix the function get_victim_by_default, where it checks
      for the condition  that p.min_segno != NULL_SEGNO as
      shown:
      
      if (p.min_segno != NULL_SEGNO)
                 goto got_it;
      
      and if above condition is true then
      
      got_it:
              if (p.min_segno != NULL_SEGNO) {
      
      So this condition is being checked twice. Hence move the goto
      statement after the if condition so that duplication of condition
      check is avoided.
      
      Also this function makes a call to get_max_cost() to compute
      the max cost based on the f2fs_sbi_info and victim policy. Since
      get_max_cost depends on on three parameters of victim_sel_policy
      => alloc_mode, gc_mode & ofs_unit, once this victim policy is
      initialised, these value will not change till the execution
      time of get_victim_by_default() & also f2fs_sbi_info structure
      parameters will not change.
      
      Hence making calls to get_max_cost() in while loop does not seems to
      be a good point. Instead we can call it once in begining and store
      the results in local variable, which later can serve our purpose
      for comparing the cost with max cost inside the while loop.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPankaj Kumar <pankaj.km@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      b2b3460a
  4. 03 Jun, 2013 1 commit
  5. 28 May, 2013 34 commits
  6. 26 May, 2013 2 commits
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Linux 3.10-rc3 · e4aa937e
      Linus Torvalds authored
      e4aa937e
    • Manfred Spraul's avatar
      ipc/sem.c: Fix missing wakeups in do_smart_update_queue() · ab465df9
      Manfred Spraul authored
      do_smart_update_queue() is called when an operation (semop,
      semctl(SETVAL), semctl(SETALL), ...) modified the array.  It must check
      which of the sleeping tasks can proceed.
      
      do_smart_update_queue() missed a few wakeups:
       - if a sleeping complex op was completed, then all per-semaphore queues
         must be scanned - not only those that were modified by *sops
       - if a sleeping simple op proceeded, then the global queue must be
         scanned again
      
      And:
       - the test for "|sops == NULL) before scanning the global queue is not
         required: If the global queue is empty, then it doesn't need to be
         scanned - regardless of the reason for calling do_smart_update_queue()
      
      The patch is not optimized, i.e.  even completing a wait-for-zero
      operation causes a rescan.  This is done to keep the patch as simple as
      possible.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarManfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ab465df9