- 22 Oct, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The code that checks lock ordering was recently changed to go off of the pos of the btree node, rather than the iterator, but the btree cache code didn't update to handle iterators that point to cached bkeys. Oops Also, update various debug code. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
state lock isn't held at startup Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Also tweak the allocator to be more aggressive about keeping it full. The recent changes to make updates to interior nodes transactional (and thus generate updates to the alloc btree) all put more stress on the btree node reserves. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This introduces a new kind of btree iterator, cached iterators, which point to keys cached in a hash table. The cache also acts as a write cache - in the update path, we journal the update but defer updating the btree until the cached entry is flushed by journal reclaim. Cache coherency is for now up to the users to handle, which isn't ideal but should be good enough for now. These new iterators will be used for updating inodes and alloc info (the alloc and stripes btrees). Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Full mark and sweep gc doesn't (yet?) work with the new btree key cache code, but it also blocks updates to interior btree nodes for the duration and isn't really necessary in practice; we aren't currently attempting to repair errors in allocation info at runtime. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
To be used the debug tool that dumps the contents of the journal. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Btree node lock ordering is based on the logical key. However, 'struct btree' may be reused for a different btree node under memory pressure. This patch uses the new six lock callback to check if a btree node is no longer the node we wanted to lock before blocking. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
__bch2_btree_node_lock() was incorrectly using iter->pos as a proxy for btree node lock ordering, this caused an off by one error that was triggered by bch2_btree_node_get_sibling() getting the previous node. This refactors the code to compare against btree node keys directly. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This splits out the journalling code from the btree update code; prep work for the btree key cache. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This is better than skipping the journal pre-reservation if we already have one - we should still acount for the journal reservation we're going to have to get. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
We need a larger open bucket reserve now that the btree interior update path holds onto open bucket references; filesystems with many high through devices may need more open buckets now. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
The btree cache lock is needed for reclaiming from the btree node cache, and memory allocation can potentially spin and sleep (for 100 ms at a time), so.. don't do that. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Also, in the btree_update_start() path, if we already have a journal pre-reservation we don't want to take another - that's a deadlock. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
bch2_btree_node_mem_alloc() uses memalloc_nofs_save()/GFP_NOFS, but GFP_NOFS does include __GFP_IO - oops. We used to use GFP_NOIO, but as we're a filesystem now GFP_NOFS makes more sense now and is looser. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
bch2_btree_iter_downgrade() was looping over all iterators in a transaction; bch2_trans_downgrade() should be doing that. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This will help narrow down which code is at fault when this happens. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Not doing so confuses copygc Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
It's not needed anymore since we can now write to buckets before updating the alloc btree. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This also consolidates the various checks in bch2_mark_pointer() and bch2_trans_mark_pointer(). Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
There was a bad interaction with bch2_btree_iter_set_pos_same_leaf(), which can leave a btree node locked that is just outside iter->pos, breaking the lock ordering checks in __bch2_btree_node_lock(). Ideally we should get rid of this corner case, but for now fix it locally with verbose comments. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Intented to help debug deadlocks, since we can't use lockdep to check btree node lock ordering. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Before we were setting features after allocating btree nodes, which meant we were using the old btree pointer format. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Reflink might be buggy, so we're adding an option so users can help bisect what's going on. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Now that interior btree updates are fully transactional, we don't need to write out alloc info in a loop. However, interior btree updates do put more things in the journal, so we still need a loop in the RO sequence. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
This is to break a circular dependency in the shutdown path. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
this fixes a lockdep splat Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
We now update the alloc info (bucket sector counts) atomically with journalling the update to the interior btree nodes, and we also set new btree roots atomically with the journalled part of the btree update. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
When updates to interior nodes started being journalled, that meant that after an unclean shutdown, until journal replay is done we can't walk the btree without overlaying the updates from the journal. The initial btree gc was changed to walk the btree overlaying keys from the journal - but bch2_alloc_read() and bch2_stripes_read() were missed. Major whoops... Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-
Kent Overstreet authored
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
-