The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-31-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-30-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-29-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-28-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-27-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-26-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919174931.1417681-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Kionix KX132-1211 is a tri-axis 16-bit accelerometer that can support
ranges from ±2G to ±16G, digital output through I²C/SPI.
Add support for basic accelerometer features such as reading acceleration
via IIO using raw reads, triggered buffer (data-ready), or the WMI IRQ.

Datasheet: https://kionixfs.azureedge.net/en/document/KX132-1211-Technical-Reference-Manual-Rev-5.0.pdfAcked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/389a7d6100ff2e71b1c5d60bebe662d09435996a.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Since Kionix accelerometers use various numbers of bits to report data, a
device-specific function is required.
Implement the function as a callback in the device-specific chip_info structure
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9c550fb28e34915d473e379f812c7753f7643bae.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Add the chip_info structure to the driver's private data to hold all
the device specific infos.
Refactor the kx022a driver implementation to make it more generic and
extensible.
Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7a31d0cdefba15d7c791252ec8bc5db553b3996b.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Add the missing i2c device id.
Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/61b43bbf35d602eac34b6d81b4d1b2d7ba39786f.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Avoid error returns on a failure to match and instead just warn with
assumption that we have a correct dt-binding telling us that
some new device with a different ID is backwards compatible.
Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b587cfec2f3350623277005f62121864bee857c7.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Remove blank lines pointed out by the checkpatch script
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3489099f653491e97b13b8f19fe86635b03020c8.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Extend the kionix,kx022a.yaml file to support the kx132-1211 device
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/735004c624082aead6e08ae37ea4fc086b11cf86.1694867379.git.mehdi.djait.k@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The STX104 features an 8254 Counter/Timer chip providing three
counter/timers which can be used for frequency measurement, frequency
output, pulse width modulation, pulse width measurement, event count,
etc. The STX104 provides a register bank selection to bank select
between the 8254 Bank and the Indexed Register Array Bank; the Indexed
Register Array is not utilized by this driver, so the 8254 Bank is
selected unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230916112031.3634-1-william.gray@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The devm_clk_register() is deprecated and devm_clk_hw_register() should be
used as a replacement.

Switching to the clk_hw interface also allows to use the built-in device
managed version of registering the clock provider. The non-clk_hw interface
does not have a device managed version.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230910140903.551081-1-lars@metafoo.deSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

According to the datasheet switching to a new channel function implies
multiple steps.

All functions must be selected for a minimum of 130 μs before changing
to another function.
The DAC_CODEx registers are not reset by changing channel functions.
Prior to changing channel functions, it is recommended to set the DAC
code to 0x0000 via the DAC_CODEx registers. Set the channel function
to high impedance via the CH_FUNC_SETUPx registers before transitioning
to the new channel function. After the new channel function is configured,
it is recommended to wait 150 μs before updating the DAC code.

Even though the channel switch is done at only at probe, where a device
reset is performed, that does not guarantee that the steps prior
changing to new channel function should be neglected.
Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230911142950.216687-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>