When system enters power off, the _PSW of Lid device is enabled.
But this may cause the system to reboot instead of power off.

A proper way to fix this is to always disable lid wakeup capability for S5.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35262Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

During resume from system suspend the 'data' field of
struct pnp_dev in pnpacpi_set_resources() may be a stale pointer,
due to removal of the associated ACPI device node object in the
previous suspend-resume cycle.  This happens, for example, if a
dockable machine is booted in the docking station and then suspended
and resumed and suspended again.  If that happens,
pnpacpi_build_resource_template() called from pnpacpi_set_resources()
attempts to use that pointer and crashes.

However, pnpacpi_set_resources() actually checks the device's ACPI
handle, attempts to find the ACPI device node object attached to it
and returns an error code if that fails, so in fact it knows what the
correct value of dev->data should be.  Use this observation to update
dev->data with the correct value if necessary and dump a call trace
if that's the case (once).

We still need to fix the root cause of this issue, but preventing
systems from crashing because of it is an improvement too.
Reported-and-tested-by: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51071
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI video driver can't control backlight correctly on
Asus UL30VT.  Vendor driver (asus-laptop) can work.  This patch is to
add "Asus UL30VT" to ACPI video detect blacklist in order to use
asus-laptop for video control on the "Asus UL30VT" rather than ACPI
video driver.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32592Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The current acpisleep DMI checks only run when CONFIG_SUSPEND is set.
And this may break hibernation on some platforms when CONFIG_SUSPEND
is cleared.

Move acpisleep DMI check into #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP instead.

[rjw: Added acpi_sleep_dmi_check() and rebased on top of earlier
 patches adding entries to acpisleep_dmi_table[].]
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45921Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

On some platforms, _TMP and _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx have dependency.
And there is no way for OS to detect this dependency.

commit 9bcb8118 shows us a problem
that _TMP must be evaluate after _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx, or else
firmware will shutdown the system.

But the machine in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43284
shows us that _PSV would return valid value only if _TMP has been
evaluated once.

With this patch, all of the control methods will be evaluated once,
in the _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_CRT/_TMP order, before they are actually used.

[rjw: Added a local variable for the handle and modified the loop
 slightly.]
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: katabami <katabami@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The LEN variable is unsigned, therefore checking whether it is less than 0 is
useless. Also drop the LEN variable, since the COUNT parameter can be used
instead.

[rjw: Changed the subject.]
Signed-off-by: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Work around a defect in the printk subsystem introduced by a
logging change.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Updated Dock hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>()
and pr_<level>().  Replaced acpi_get_name() & kfree() with
apci_handle_<level>().  Added error status to the messages where
needed.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Updated Container hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>()
and pr_<level>().  Removed an unnecessary check to the device arg
in acpi_container_add().
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Updated Memory hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>(),
dev_<level>() and pr_<level>().  Added missing "\n".
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Updated CPU hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>(),
dev_<level>() and pr_<level>().  Modified some messages for
clarity.  Added error status / id info to the messages where
needed.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Tested-by: Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This patch introduces acpi_handle_<level>(), where <level> is
a kernel message level such as err/warn/info, to support improved
logging messages for ACPI, esp. hot-plug operations.
acpi_handle_<level>() appends "ACPI" prefix and ACPI object path
to the messages.  This improves diagnosis of hotplug operations
since an error message in a log file identifies an object that
caused an issue.  This interface acquires the global namespace
mutex to obtain an object path.  In interrupt context, it shows
the object path as <n/a>.

acpi_handle_<level>() takes acpi_handle as an argument, which is
passed to ACPI hotplug notify handlers from the ACPICA.  Therefore,
it is always available unlike other kernel objects, such as device.

For example:
  acpi_handle_err(handle, "Device don't exist, dropping EJECT\n");
logs an error message like this at KERN_ERR.
  ACPI: \_SB_.SCK4.CPU4: Device don't exist, dropping EJECT

ACPI hot-plug drivers can use acpi_handle_<level>() when they need
to identify a target ACPI object path in their messages, such as
error cases.  The usage model is similar to dev_<level>().
acpi_handle_<level>() can be used when a device is not created or
is invalid during hot-plug operations.  ACPI object path is also
consistent on the platform, unlike device name that gets incremented
over hotplug operations.

ACPI drivers should use dev_<level>() when a device object is valid.
Device name provides more user friendly information, and avoids
acquiring the global ACPI namespace mutex.  ACPI drivers also
continue to use pr_<level>() when they do not need to specify device
information, such as boot-up messages.

Note: ACPI_[WARNING|INFO|ERROR]() are intended for the ACPICA and
are not associated with the kernel message level.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Tested-by: Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit is no
longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Sony Vaio VPCEB1S1E does not resume correctly without
acpi_sleep=nonvs, so add it to the ACPI sleep blacklist.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48781Reported-by: Sébastien Wilmet <swilmet@gnome.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add a quirk to correctly report battery capacity on 2010 and 2011
Lenovo Thinkpad models.

The affected models that I tested (x201, t410, t410s, and x220)
exhibit a problem where, when battery capacity reporting unit is mAh,
the values being reported are wrong.  Pre-2010 and 2012 models appear
to always report in mWh and are thus unaffected.  Also, in mid-2012
Lenovo issued a BIOS update for the 2011 models that fixes the issue
(tested on x220 with a post-1.29 BIOS).  No such update is available
for the 2010 models, so those still need this patch.

Problem description: for some reason, the affected Thinkpads switch
the reporting unit between mAh and mWh; generally, mAh is used when a
laptop is plugged in and mWh when it's unplugged, although a
suspend/resume or rmmod/modprobe is needed for the switch to take
effect.  The values reported in mAh are *always* wrong.  This does
not appear to be a kernel regression; I believe that the values were
never reported correctly.  I tested back to kernel 2.6.34, with
multiple machines and BIOS versions.

Simply plugging a laptop into mains before turning it on is enough to
reproduce the problem.  Here's a sample /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info
from Thinkpad x220 (before a BIOS update) with a 4-cell battery:

present:                 yes
design capacity:         2886 mAh
last full capacity:      2909 mAh
battery technology:      rechargeable
design voltage:          14800 mV
design capacity warning: 145 mAh
design capacity low:     13 mAh
cycle count:              0
capacity granularity 1:  1 mAh
capacity granularity 2:  1 mAh
model number:            42T4899
serial number:           21064
battery type:            LION
OEM info:                SANYO

Once the laptop switches the unit to mWh (unplug from mains, suspend,
resume), the output changes to:

present:                 yes
design capacity:         28860 mWh
last full capacity:      29090 mWh
battery technology:      rechargeable
design voltage:          14800 mV
design capacity warning: 1454 mWh
design capacity low:     200 mWh
cycle count:              0
capacity granularity 1:  1 mWh
capacity granularity 2:  1 mWh
model number:            42T4899
serial number:           21064
battery type:            LION
OEM info:                SANYO

Can you see how the values for "design capacity", etc., differ by a
factor of 10 instead of 14.8 (the design voltage of this battery)?
On the battery itself it says: 14.8V, 1.95Ah, 29Wh, so clearly the
values reported in mWh are correct and the ones in mAh are not.

My guess is that this problem has been around ever since those
machines were released, but because the most common Thinkpad
batteries are rated at 10.8V, the error (8%) is small enough that it
simply hasn't been noticed or at least nobody could be bothered to
look into it.

My patch works around the problem by adjusting the incorrectly
reported mAh values by "10000 / design_voltage".  The patch also has
code to figure out if it should be activated or not.  It only
activates on Lenovo Thinkpads, only when the unit is mAh, and, as an
extra precaution, only when the battery capacity reported through
ACPI does not match what is reported through DMI (I've never
encountered a machine where the first two conditions would be true
but the last would not, but better safe than sorry).

I've been using this patch for close to a year on several systems
without any problems.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41062Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This reverts commit 0a290ac4 on
the basis of the following comment from Bjorn Helgaas:

  Here's my reasoning: this is a CheckPoint product, and it looks
  like an appliance, not really a general-purpose machine.  The issue
  has apparently been there from day one, and the kernel shipped on
  the machine complains noisily about the issue, but apparently
  nobody bothered to investigate it.

  This corruption will clearly break other ACPI-related things.  We
  can sort of work around this one (though the workaround does
  prevent us from doing any PCI resource reassignment), but we have
  no idea what the other lurking ACPI issues are (and we have no
  assurance that *only* ACPI things are broken -- maybe the
  memory corruption affects other unknown things).  It may take
  significant debugging effort to identify the next problem.

  The only report I've seen (this one) is apparently from a
  CheckPoint employee, so it's not clear that anybody else is trying
  to run upstream Linux on it.  Being a CheckPoint employee, [...]
  is probably in a position to get the BIOS fixed.

  You might still be able to convince me, but it seems like the
  benefit to a quirk for this platform is small, and it does cost
  everybody else something in code size and complexity.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47981#c36Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

_SUN method provides the slot unique-ID in the ACPI namespace. And The value
is written in Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification as
follows:

"The _SUN value is required to be unique among the slots ofthe same type.
It is also recommended that this number match the slot number printed on
the physical slot whenever possible."

So if we can know the value, we can identify the physical position of the
slot in the system.

The patch creates "sun" file in sysfs for identifying physical position
of the slot.
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We had introduced acpi_hotmem_initialized to avoid strange add_memory fail
message.  But the memory device may not be used by the kernel, and the
device should be bound when the driver is being loaded.  Remove
acpi_hotmem_initialized to allow that the device can be bound when the
driver is being loaded.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We eject the memory device even if it is in use.  It is very dangerous,
and it will cause the kernel to be panicked.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If acpi_memory_enable_device() fails, acpi_memory_enable_device() will
return a non-zero value, which means we fail to bind the memory device to
this driver.  So we should free memory device before
acpi_memory_device_add() returns.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We allocate memory to store acpi_memory_info, so we should free it before
freeing mem_device.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
 1. send eject request by SCI
 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject

We handle the 1st case in the module acpi_memhotplug, and handle
the 2nd case in ACPI eject notification. This 2 events may happen
at the same time, so we may touch acpi_memory_device.res_list at
the same time. This patch reimplements memory-hotremove support
through an ACPI eject notification. Now the memory device is
offlined and hotremoved only in the function acpi_memory_device_remove()
which is protected by device_lock().
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
 1. send eject request by SCI
 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject

In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the
memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug or a driver initialization
fails.

acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which
offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct. But
acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet.

So the patch move offlining memory and releasing acpi_memory_info struct
codes to a new function acpi_memory_remove_memory(). And it is used by both
acpi_memory_device_remove() and acpi_memory_disable_device().
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The memory device has been ejected and powoffed, so we can call
acpi_bus_trim() to remove the memory device from acpi bus.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add newline to printk so that the message is on a line
by itself and not merged with something unrelated to it.
Reported-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is a seemingly useless check in drivers/acpi/osl.c added by
commit bc73675b (ACPI: fixes a false alarm from lockdep), which really
is necessary to avoid false positive lockdep complaints.  Document
this and rearrange the code related to it so that it makes fewer
checks.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

Added support of CPU hot-remove via an ACPI eject notification.
It calls acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), which shares the same code
path with the sysfs eject operation.  acpi_os_hotplug_execute()
runs the hot-remove operation in kacpi_hotplug_wq and serializes
it between ACPI hot-remove and sysfs eject requests.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: IgorMammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Vijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com>
Tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Exported acpi_os_hotplug_execute() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
so that they can be called from modules for hot-remove operations.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

ACPI devices are glued with physical devices through _ADR object, ACPI
enumerated devices are identified with _UID object.  Currently we can
observe _HID/_CID through sysfs interfaces (hid/modalias), but there's
no way for us to check _ADR/_UID from user space.  This patch closes
this gap for ACPI developers and users.

[rjw: Modified the subject and changelog slightly.]
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The _UID object is optional, but is required when the device has no
other way to report a persistent unique device ID.
This patch is required for ACPI 5.0 ACPI enumerated IP cores.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

acpi_no_s4_hw_signature is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block,
but the current code put the declaration in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block.

I happened to meet this issue when I turned off PM_SLEEP config manually:
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:100:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_no_s4_hw_signature’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI specificiation would like us to save NVS at hibernation time,
but makes no mention of saving NVS over S3.  Not all versions of
Windows do this either, and it is clear that not all machines need NVS
saved/restored over S3.  Allow the user to improve their suspend/resume
time by disabling the NVS save/restore at S3 time, but continue to do
the NVS save/restore for S4 as specified.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Removed lockable in struct acpi_device_flags since it is no
longer used by any code. acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() cannot
use this flag because acpi_bus_trim() frees up its acpi_device
object. Furthermore, the dock driver calls _LCK method without
using this lockable flag.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

During hot-remove, acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() calls ACPI _LCK
method when device->flags.lockable is set. However, this device
pointer is stale since the target acpi_device object has been
already kfree'd by acpi_bus_trim().

The flags.lockable indicates whether or not this ACPI object
implements _LCK method. Fix the stable pointer access by replacing
it with acpi_get_handle() to check if _LCK is implemented.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

"ACPI0004","PNP0A05" and "PNP0A06" are all defined in array
container_device_ids[], so use it, but not the hard coding style.

Also, introduce a new API is_container_device() to determine if a
device is a container device.
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This is to fix a regression https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47981

The CheckPoint P-20-00 works ok before new machines (2008 and later) are
forced to use the bridge _CRS info by default in 2.6.34. Add this quirk
to restore its old way of working: not using bridge _CRS info.
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Even if acpi_processor_handle_eject() offlines cpu, there is a chance
to online the cpu after that. So the patch closes the window by using
get/put_online_cpus().

Why does the patch change _cpu_up() logic?

The patch cares the race of hot-remove cpu and _cpu_up(). If the patch
does not change it, there is the following race.

hot-remove cpu                         |  _cpu_up()
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
call acpi_processor_handle_eject()     |
     call cpu_down()                   |
     call get_online_cpus()            |
                                       | call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here
     call arch_unregister_cpu()        |
     call acpi_unmap_lsapic()          |
     call put_online_cpus()            |
                                       | start and continue _cpu_up()
     return acpi_processor_remove()    |
continue hot-remove the cpu            |

So _cpu_up() can continue to itself. And hot-remove cpu can also continue
itself. If the patch changes _cpu_up() logic, the race disappears as below:

hot-remove cpu                         | _cpu_up()
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
call acpi_processor_handle_eject()     |
     call cpu_down()                   |
     call get_online_cpus()            |
                                       | call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here
     call arch_unregister_cpu()        |
     call acpi_unmap_lsapic()          |
          cpu's cpu_present is set     |
          to false by set_cpu_present()|
     call put_online_cpus()            |
                                       | start _cpu_up()
                                       | check cpu_present() and return -EINVAL
     return acpi_processor_remove()    |
continue hot-remove the cpu            |
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Replace a few calls to strict_strtoul() in acpi_pad.c with kstrtoul()
and use pr_warn() instead of printk() in the same file.

[rjw: Modified the subject and changelog.]
Signed-off-by: Josh Taylor <joshua.taylor0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Combined two ACPI namespace walks, which look for dock stations
and then bays separately, into a single walk.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently when advance_transaction() is called in EC interrupt handler,
if there is nothing driver can do with the interrupt, it will be taken
as a false one.

But this is not always true, as there may be a SCI EC interrupt fired
during normal read/write operation, which should not be counted as a
false one. This patch fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>