This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This is purely preparation for upcoming commits, there should be no
code changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Pretty much every subdev/engine is going to need access to nvkm_device
shortly to touch registers and/or output messages.

The odd placement of the includes is necessary to work around some
inter-dependencies that currently exist.  This will be fixed later.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

A future commit will hide the platform/pci specifics from nvkm_device,
but it's still very useful in a lot of places to have access to the
Linux device struct.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Will be used in upcoming commits to remove the need for lookup/runtime
type-checking functions when accessing foreign subdevs.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Will be utilised in upcoming commits to remove the need for heuristics
to lookup the device a subdev belongs to.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Only a handful of machines have this enabled by default, where it's been
proven to work.  The workaround can be explicitly enabled with a module
option also.

Still waiting on feedback from NVIDIA for a proper idea of exactly what
this fix is doing, and how to implement it properly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Fixes 2-lane DP on Quadro K620.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We only need to mask 0x0f on GM2xx, and want to keep the higher bits on
earlier cards.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We previously assumed that the values "2" and "4" were new in DCB 4.1,
however, there's at least one GM107 DCB 4.0 board (Quadro K620) that
uses the newer values.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

MSI interrupts appear to not work for nv46 based cards. Change the mc
subdev oclass for these cards from nv44 to nv4c, the nv4c mc code is
identical to the nv44 mc code except that it does not use msi
(it does not define a msi_rearm callback).

BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90435Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

High level hardware events related to PBFB will monitor all partitions.
While we are at it, fix bitfield for this mux.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This mux only exists on GF108+ (except for GF110 one), but since it is
not used by the userspace we can drop it for now.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Hardware signals index 0x00 are defined for some domains and they have
to be allowed to enable sources like the others.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

I thought that using TPC[0x0] like for G84:GT215 was sufficient on G80,
but it's actually not the case. According to NVIDIA PerfKit on Windows,
we have to configure PGRAPH related muxs on TPC[0x3] for this chipset.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

No known VBIOSes use these, but they are present in the actual VBIOS
table parsing logic. No harm in adding these too.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Allow the platform driver to recognize GM20B.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Recognize GM20B and assign the right engines and subdevs.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Add support for GM20B's graphics engine, based on GK20A. Note that this
code alone will not allow the engine to initialize on released devices
which require PMU-assisted secure boot.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

GM20B has a 512-channels FIFO similar to GK104.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

GK20A's initialization was based on GK104, but differences exist in the
way the initial context is built and the initialization process itself.

This patch follows the same initialization sequence as nvgpu performs
to avoid bad surprises. Since the register bundles initialization also
differ considerably from GK104, the register packs are now loaded from
firmware files, again similarly to what is done with nvgpu.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

NVIDIA will officially start providing GR firmwares through
linux-firmware for GPUs that require it. Change the GR firmware lookup
function to use these files.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

These signals and sources have been reverse engineered from CUPTI
(Linux). Graphics signals exposed by PerfKit (Windows only) will be
added later. I need to reverse engineer them and it's a bit painful.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

gk104_pm_ctor() is equal to gf100_pm_ctor().
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This trivial patch makes thing more consistent since hardware signals
names are prefixed by 'pcXX'.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>