This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Acked-by: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

This is a similar cleanup like the commit [3db084fd: ALSA: fm801:
PCI core handles power state for us].

Since pci_set_power_state(), pci_save_state() and pci_restore_state()
are already done in the PCI core side, so we don't need to it doubly.

Also, pci_enable_device(), pci_disable_device() and pci_set_master()
calls in PM callbacks are superfluous nowadays, too, so get rid of
them as well.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

There is no need to repeat the work that is already done in the PCI
driver core. The patch removes excerpts from suspend and resume
callbacks.

Note that there is no more calls performed to enable or disable a PCI
device during suspend-resume cycle. Nowadays they seems to be
superflous. Someone can read more in [1].

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/ols/2009/ols2009-pages-319-330.pdfSigned-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

The managed functions allow to get ->probe() and ->remove() simplier.
This patch converts code to use managed functions.

While here remove the dead code and fix the value printed in error
message.

[removed pci_release_regions() as it's managed in pcim_release(), too
  -- tiwai]
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

Pull powerpc fixes from Michael Ellerman:

 - Wire up sys_execveat(). Tested on 32 & 64 bit.

 - Fix for kdump on LE systems with cpus hot unplugged.

 - Revert Anton's fix for "kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:134!", this
   broke other platforms, we'll do a proper fix for 3.20.

* tag 'powerpc-3.19-3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mpe/linux:
  Revert "powerpc: Secondary CPUs must set cpu_callin_map after setting active and online"
  powerpc/kdump: Ignore failure in enabling big endian exception during crash
  powerpc: Wire up sys_execveat() syscall

Pull ia64 fixlet from Tony Luck:
 "Add execveat syscall"

* tag 'please-pull-syscall' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux:
  [IA64] Enable execveat syscall for ia64

See commit 51f39a1f
    syscalls: implement execveat() system call
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

Pull UML fixes from Richard Weinberger:
 "Two fixes for UML regressions. Nothing exciting"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml:
  x86, um: actually mark system call tables readonly
  um: Skip futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() test

Commit 9fc2105a ("ARM: 7830/1: delay: don't bother reporting
bogomips in /proc/cpuinfo") breaks audio in python, and probably
elsewhere, with message

  FATAL: cannot locate cpu MHz in /proc/cpuinfo

I'm not the first one to hit it, see for example

  https://theredblacktree.wordpress.com/2014/08/10/fatal-cannot-locate-cpu-mhz-in-proccpuinfo/
  https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/765800/workaround-for-fatal-cannot-locate-cpu-mhz-in-proc-cpuinf/?offset=1

Reading original changelog, I have to say "Stop breaking working setups.
You know who you are!".
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>