- 16 Dec, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Alex Shi authored
There some macros are unused and cause gcc warning. Remove them. fs/nilfs2/segment.c:137:0: warning: macro "nilfs_cnt32_gt" is not used [-Wunused-macros] fs/nilfs2/segment.c:144:0: warning: macro "nilfs_cnt32_le" is not used [-Wunused-macros] fs/nilfs2/segment.c:143:0: warning: macro "nilfs_cnt32_lt" is not used [-Wunused-macros] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1607552733-24292-1-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Joe Perches authored
Add the _once and _ratelimited variants to the test for printk(KERN_<LEVEL> that should prefer pr_<level>. Miscellanea: o Add comment description for the conversions [joe@perches.com: fixlet] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/32260871d4718ba7f48a8e9e07452bb76de300db.camel@perches.comLink: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/993b72b2ef91a57c5e725b52971ce3fd31375061.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by:
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dwaipayan Ray authored
checkpatch reports a false TYPO_SPELLING warning for some words containing an apostrophe when run with --codespell option. A false positive is "doesn't". Occurrence of the word causes checkpatch to emit the following warning: "WARNING: 'doesn'' may be misspelled - perhaps 'doesn't'?" Modify the regex pattern to be more in line with the codespell default word matching regex. This fixes the word capture and avoids the false warning. In addition, highlight the misspelled word location by adding a caret below the word. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: make matched misspelling more obvious, per Joe] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/09c24ef1aa2f1c4fe909d76f5426f08780b9d81c.camel@perches.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201201190729.169733-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> Suggested-by:
Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com> Acked-by:
-
Dwaipayan Ray authored
Commit log lines starting with '#' are dropped by git as comments. Add a check to emit a warning for these lines. Also add a --fix option to insert a space before the leading '#' in such lines. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201202205740.127986-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Dwaipayan Ray authored
Modifiers %h and %hh should never be used. Commit cbacb5ab ("docs: printk-formats: Stop encouraging use of unnecessary %h[xudi] and %hh[xudi]") specifies that: "Standard integer promotion is already done and %hx and %hhx is useless so do not encourage the use of %hh[xudi] or %h[xudi]." "The "h" and "hh" things should never be used. The only reason for them being used if you have an "int", but you want to print it out as a "char" (and honestly, that is a really bad reason, you'd be better off just using a proper cast to make the code more obvious)." Add a new check to emit a warning on finding an unneeded use of %h or %hh modifier. Also add a fix option to the check. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4910042649a4f3ab22fac93191b8c1fa0a2e17c3.camel@perches.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201128200046.78739-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Acked-by:
-
Aditya Srivastava authored
Currently checkpatch warns for BAD_SIGN_OFF on non-standard signature styles. A large number of these warnings occur because of typo mistakes in signature tags. An evaluation over v4.13..v5.8 showed that out of 539 warnings due to non-standard signatures, 87 are due to typo mistakes. Following are the standard signature tags which are often incorrectly used, along with their individual counts of incorrect use (over v4.13..v5.8): Reviewed-by: 42 Signed-off-by: 25 Reported-by: 6 Acked-by: 4 Tested-by: 4 Suggested-by: 4 Provide a fix by calculating levenshtein distance for the signature tag with all the standard signatures and suggest a fix with a signature, whose edit distance is less than or equal to 2 with the misspelled signature. Out of the 86 mispelled signatures fixed with this approach, 85 were found to be good corrections and 1 was bad correction. Following was found to be a bad correction: Tweeted-by (count: 1) => Tested-by Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201128204333.7054-1-yashsri421@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> Acked-by:
-
Aditya Srivastava authored
Currently, checkpatch warns if logical continuations are placed at the start of a line and not at the end of previous line. E.g., running checkpatch on commit 3485507f ("staging: bcm2835-camera: Reduce length of enum names") reports: CHECK:LOGICAL_CONTINUATIONS: Logical continuations should be on the previous line + if (!ret + && camera_port == Provide a simple fix by inserting logical operator at the last non-comment, non-whitespace char of the previous line and removing from current line, if both the lines are additions(ie start with '+') Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201123102818.24364-1-yashsri421@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Aditya Srivastava authored
Currently, checkpatch warns us if an assignment operator is placed at the start of a line and not at the end of previous line. E.g., running checkpatch on commit 8195b139 ("hv_netvsc: fix deadlock on hotplug") reports: CHECK: Assignment operator '=' should be on the previous line + struct netvsc_device *nvdev + = container_of(w, struct netvsc_device, subchan_work); Provide a simple fix by appending assignment operator to the previous line and removing from the current line, if both the lines are additions (ie start with '+') Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121120407.22942-1-yashsri421@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Dwaipayan Ray authored
There is an unescaped left brace in a regex in OPEN_BRACE check. This throws a runtime error when checkpatch is run with --fix flag and the OPEN_BRACE check is executed. Fix it by escaping the left brace. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201115202928.81955-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com Fixes: 8d182478 ("checkpatch: add --fix option for a couple OPEN_BRACE misuses") Signed-off-by:
-
Aditya Srivastava authored
Currently checkpatch warns us for long lines in commits even for signature tag lines. Generally these lines exceed the 75-character limit because of: 1) long names and long email address 2) some comments on scoped review and acknowledgement, i.e., for a dedicated pointer on what was reported by the identity in 'Reported-by' 3) some additional comments on CC: stable@vger.org tags Exclude signature tag lines from this class of warning. There were 1896 COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE warnings in v5.6..v5.8 before this patch application and 1879 afterwards. A quick manual check found all the dropped warnings related to signature tags. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201116083754.10629-1-yashsri421@gmail.comSigned-off-by: -
Dwaipayan Ray authored
Delete repeated word in scripts/checkpatch.pl: "are are" -> "are" Fix typos: "commments" -> "comments" "falsly" -> "falsely" Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113152316.62975-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Dwaipayan Ray authored
checkpatch doesn't report warnings for many common mistakes in emails. Some of which are trailing commas and incorrect use of email comments. At the same time several false positives are reported due to incorrect handling of mail comments. The most common of which is due to the pattern: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # X.X Improve email parsing in checkpatch. Some general email rules are defined: - Multiple name comments should not be allowed. - Comments inside address should not be allowed. - In general comments should be enclosed within parentheses. Relaxation is given to comments beginning with #. - Stable addresses should not begin with a name. - Comments in stable addresses should begin only with a #. Improvements to parsing: - Detect and report unexpected content after email. - Quoted names are excluded from comment parsing. - Trailing dots, commas or quotes in email are removed during formatting. Correspondingly a BAD_SIGN_OFF warning is emitted. - Improperly quoted email like '"name <address>"' are now warned about. In addition, added fixes for all the possible rules. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/6c275d95c3033422addfc256a30e6ae3dd37941d.camel@perches.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/20201105200857.GC1333458@kroah.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201108100632.75340-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Joe Perches authored
Add __alias and __weak to the suggested __attribute__((<foo>)) conversions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/7b74137743c58ce0633ec4d575b94e2210e4dbe7.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by:
-
Aditya Srivastava authored
Currently, whenever a Gerrit Change-Id is present in a commit, checkpatch.pl warns to remove the Change-Id before submitting the patch. E.g., running checkpatch on commit adc311a5 ("iwlwifi: bump FW API to 53 for 22000 series") reports this error: ERROR: Remove Gerrit Change-Id's before submitting upstream Change-Id: I5725e46394f3f53c3069723fd513cc53c7df383d Provide a simple fix option by simply deleting the indicated line. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201030114447.24199-1-yashsri421@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Joe Perches authored
commit 33def849 ("treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo) to __section("foo")") removed the stringification of the section name and now requires quotes around the named section. Update checkpatch to not remove any quotes when suggesting conversion of __attribute__((section("name"))) to __section("name") Miscellanea: o Add section to the hash with __section replacement o Remove separate test for __attribute__((section o Remove the limitation on converting attributes containing only known, possible conversions. Any unknown attribute types are now left as-is and known types are converted and moved before __attribute__ and removed from within the __attribute__((list...)). [joe@perches.com: eliminate the separate test below the possible conversions loop] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/58e9d55e933dc8fdc6af489f2ad797fa8eb13e44.camel@perches.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c04dd1c810e8d6a68e6a632e3191ae91651c8edf.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by:
-
Tom Rix authored
Remove the trailing error message from the fixed lines. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201017142546.28988-1-trix@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Acked-by:
-
Dwaipayan Ray authored
It is generally preferred that the macros from include/linux/compiler_attributes.h are used, unless there is a reason not to. checkpatch currently checks __attribute__ for each of packed, aligned, section, printf, scanf, and weak. Other declarations in compiler_attributes.h are not handled. Add a generic test to check the presence of such attributes. Some attributes require more specific handling and are kept separate. Also add fixes to the generic attributes check to substitute the correct conversions. New attributes which are now handled are: __always_inline__ __assume_aligned__(a, ## __VA_ARGS__) __cold__ __const__ __copy__(symbol) __designated_init__ __externally_visible__ __gnu_inline__ __malloc__ __mode__(x) __no_caller_saved_registers__ __noclone__ __noinline__ __nonstring__ __noreturn__ __pure__ __unused__ __used__ Declarations which contain multiple attributes like __attribute__((__packed__, __cold__)) are also handled except when proper conversions for one or more attributes of the list cannot be determined. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/3ec15b41754b01666d94b76ce51b9832c2dd577a.camel@perches.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201025193103.23223-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Joe Perches authored
switch/case use of break after a return, goto or break is unnecessary. There is an existing warning for the return and goto uses, so add break and a --fix option too. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/d9ea654104d55f590fb97d252d64a66b23c1a096.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by:
-
Joe Perches authored
There are about 100,000 uses of 'static const <type>' but about 400 uses of 'static <type> const' in the kernel where type is not a pointer. The kernel almost always uses "static const" over "const static" as there is a compiler warning for that declaration style. But there is no compiler warning for "static <type> const". So add a checkpatch warning for the atypical declaration uses of. const static <type> <foo> and static <type> const <foo> For example: $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --emacs --quiet --nosummary -types=static_const arch/arm/crypto/aes-ce-glue.c arch/arm/crypto/aes-ce-glue.c:75: WARNING: Move const after static - use 'static const u8' #75: FILE: arch/arm/crypto/aes-ce-glue.c:75: + static u8 const rcon[] = { Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4b863be68e679546b40d50b97a4a806c03056a1c.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: -
Łukasz Stelmach authored
Ignore autogenerated CamelCase-like defines and enum values like DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_Unknown or ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201022184916.7904-1-l.stelmach@samsung.comSigned-off-by:
Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com> Suggested-by:
-
Aditya Srivastava authored
Presence of hexadecimal address or symbol results in false warning message by checkpatch.pl. For example, running checkpatch on commit b8ad540d ("mptcp: fix memory leak in mptcp_subflow_create_socket()") results in warning: WARNING:REPEATED_WORD: Possible repeated word: 'ff' 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2f 30 0a 81 88 ff ff ........./0..... Similarly, the presence of list command output in commit results in an unnecessary warning. For example, running checkpatch on commit 899e5ffb ("perf record: Introduce --switch-output-event") gives: WARNING:REPEATED_WORD: Possible repeated word: 'root' dr-xr-x---. 12 root root 4096 Apr 27 17:46 .. Here, it reports 'ff' and 'root' to be repeated, but it is in fact part of some address or code, where it has to be repeated. In these cases, the intent of the warning to find stylistic issues in commit messages is not met and the warning is just completely wrong in this case. To avoid these warnings, add an additional regex check for the directory permission pattern and avoid checking the line for this class of warning. Similarly, to avoid hex pattern, check if the word consists of hex symbols and skip this warning if it is not among the common english words formed using hex letters. A quick evaluation on v5.6..v5.8 showed that this fix reduces REPEATED_WORD warnings by the frequency of 1890. A quick manual check found all cases are related to hex output or list command outputs in commit messages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201024102253.13614-1-yashsri421@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Dwaipayan Ray authored
Recently, commit 4f6ad8aa1eac ("checkpatch: move repeated word test") moved the repeated word test to check for more file types. But after this, if checkpatch.pl is run on MAINTAINERS, it generates several new warnings of the type: WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'git' For example: WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'git' +T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml.git So, the pattern "git git://..." is a false positive in this case. There are several other combinations which may produce a wrong warning message, such as "@size size", ":Begin begin", etc. Extend repeated word check to compare the characters before and after the word matches. If there is a non whitespace character before the first word or a non whitespace character excluding punctuation characters after the second word, then the check is skipped and the warning is avoided. Also add case insensitive word matching to the repeated word check. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/81b6a0bb2c7b9256361573f7a13201ebcd4876f1.camel@perches.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201017162732.152351-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.comSigned-off-by: -
Gao Xiang authored
LZ4 final literal copy could be overlapped when doing in-place decompression, so it's unsafe to just use memcpy() on an optimized memcpy approach but memmove() instead. Upstream LZ4 has updated this years ago [1] (and the impact is non-sensible [2] plus only a few bytes remain), this commit just synchronizes LZ4 upstream code to the kernel side as well. It can be observed as EROFS in-place decompression failure on specific files when X86_FEATURE_ERMS is unsupported, memcpy() optimization of commit 59daa706 ("x86, mem: Optimize memcpy by avoiding memory false dependece") will be enabled then. Currently most modern x86-CPUs support ERMS, these CPUs just use "rep movsb" approach so no problem at all. However, it can still be verified with forcely disabling ERMS feature... arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S: ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp memcpy_orig", "", X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD, \ - "jmp memcpy_erms", X86_FEATURE_ERMS + "jmp memcpy_orig", X86_FEATURE_ERMS We didn't observe any strange on arm64/arm/x86 platform before since most memcpy() would behave in an increasing address order ("copy upwards" [3]) and it's the correct order of in-place decompression but it really needs an update to memmove() for sure considering it's an undefined behavior according to the standard and some unique optimization already exists in the kernel. [1] https://github.com/lz4/lz4/commit/33cb8518ac385835cc17be9a770b27b40cd0e15b [2] https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/717#issuecomment-497818921 [3] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122030749.2698994-1-hsiangkao@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com> Cc: Yann Collet <yann.collet.73@gmail.com> Cc: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com> Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Cc: Li Guifu <bluce.liguifu@huawei.com> Cc: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Alexey Dobriyan authored
Use proper conversion functions. kstrto*() variants exist for all standard types. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122123410.GB92364@localhost.localdomainSigned-off-by:
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Francis Laniel authored
In lkdtm.h, files targeted in comments are named "lkdtm_file.c" while there are named "file.c" in directory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122162451.27551-6-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.comSigned-off-by:
Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com> Acked-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Francis Laniel authored
This new test ensures that fortified strscpy has the same behavior than vanilla strscpy (e.g. returning -E2BIG when src content is truncated). Finally, it generates a crash at runtime because there is a write overflow in destination string. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122162451.27551-5-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.comSigned-off-by:
-
Francis Laniel authored
The fortified version of strscpy ensures the following before vanilla strscpy is called: 1. There is no read overflow because we either size is smaller than src length or we shrink size to src length by calling fortified strnlen. 2. There is no write overflow because we either failed during compilation or at runtime by checking that size is smaller than dest size. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122162451.27551-4-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.comSigned-off-by:
-
Daniel Axtens authored
Add code to test both: - runtime detection of the overrun of a structure. This covers the __builtin_object_size(x, 0) case. This test is called FORTIFY_OBJECT. - runtime detection of the overrun of a char array within a structure. This covers the __builtin_object_size(x, 1) case which can be used for some string functions. This test is called FORTIFY_SUBOBJECT. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122162451.27551-3-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.comSigned-off-by:
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Axtens authored
Patch series "Fortify strscpy()", v7. This patch implements a fortified version of strscpy() enabled by setting CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y. The new version ensures the following before calling vanilla strscpy(): 1. There is no read overflow because either size is smaller than src length or we shrink size to src length by calling fortified strnlen(). 2. There is no write overflow because we either failed during compilation or at runtime by checking that size is smaller than dest size. Note that, if src and dst size cannot be got, the patch defaults to call vanilla strscpy(). The patches adds the following: 1. Implement the fortified version of strscpy(). 2. Add a new LKDTM test to ensures the fortified version still returns the same value as the vanilla one while panic'ing when there is a write overflow. 3. Correct some typos in LKDTM related file. I based my modifications on top of two patches from Daniel Axtens which modify calls to __builtin_object_size, in fortified string functions, to ensure the true size of char * are returned and not the surrounding structure size. About performance, I measured the slow down of fortified strscpy(), using the vanilla one as baseline. The hardware I used is an Intel i3 2130 CPU clocked at 3.4 GHz. I ran "Linux 5.10.0-rc4+ SMP PREEMPT" inside qemu 3.10 with 4 CPU cores. The following code, called through LKDTM, was used as a benchmark: #define TIMES 10000 char *src; char dst[7]; int i; ktime_t begin; src = kstrdup("foobar", GFP_KERNEL); if (src == NULL) return; begin = ktime_get(); for (i = 0; i < TIMES; i++) strscpy(dst, src, strlen(src)); pr_info("%d fortified strscpy() tooks %lld", TIMES, ktime_get() - begin); begin = ktime_get(); for (i = 0; i < TIMES; i++) __real_strscpy(dst, src, strlen(src)); pr_info("%d vanilla strscpy() tooks %lld", TIMES, ktime_get() - begin); kfree(src); I called the above code 30 times to compute stats for each version (in ns, round to int): | version | mean | std | median | 95th | | --------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | | fortified | 245_069 | 54_657 | 216_230 | 331_122 | | vanilla | 172_501 | 70_281 | 143_539 | 219_553 | On average, fortified strscpy() is approximately 1.42 times slower than vanilla strscpy(). For the 95th percentile, the fortified version is about 1.50 times slower. So, clearly the stats are not in favor of fortified strscpy(). But, the fortified version loops the string twice (one in strnlen() and another in vanilla strscpy()) while the vanilla one only loops once. This can explain why fortified strscpy() is slower than the vanilla one. This patch (of 5): When the fortify feature was first introduced in commit 6974f0c4 ("include/linux/string.h: add the option of fortified string.h functions"), Daniel Micay observed: * It should be possible to optionally use __builtin_object_size(x, 1) for some functions (C strings) to detect intra-object overflows (like glibc's _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2), but for now this takes the conservative approach to avoid likely compatibility issues. This is a case that often cannot be caught by KASAN. Consider: struct foo { char a[10]; char b[10]; } void test() { char *msg; struct foo foo; msg = kmalloc(16, GFP_KERNEL); strcpy(msg, "Hello world!!"); // this copy overwrites foo.b strcpy(foo.a, msg); } The questionable copy overflows foo.a and writes to foo.b as well. It cannot be detected by KASAN. Currently it is also not detected by fortify, because strcpy considers __builtin_object_size(x, 0), which considers the size of the surrounding object (here, struct foo). However, if we switch the string functions over to use __builtin_object_size(x, 1), the compiler will measure the size of the closest surrounding subobject (here, foo.a), rather than the size of the surrounding object as a whole. See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Object-Size-Checking.html for more info. Only do this for string functions: we cannot use it on things like memcpy, memmove, memcmp and memchr_inv due to code like this which purposefully operates on multiple structure members: (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c) /* * regs->sp points to the failing IRET frame on the * ESPFIX64 stack. Copy it to the entry stack. This fills * in gpregs->ss through gpregs->ip. * */ memmove(&gpregs->ip, (void *)regs->sp, 5*8); This change passes an allyesconfig on powerpc and x86, and an x86 kernel built with it survives running with syz-stress from syzkaller, so it seems safe so far. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122162451.27551-1-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122162451.27551-2-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.comSigned-off-by: -
Nick Desaulniers authored
A few architecture specific string.h functions used to be implemented in terms of preprocessor defines to the corresponding compiler builtins. Since this is no longer the case, remove unused #undefs. Only memcmp is still defined in terms of builtins for a few arches. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/428 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120041113.89382-1-ndesaulniers@google.com Fixes: 5f074f3e ("lib/string.c: implement a basic bcmp") Signed-off-by:
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Cc: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jakub Jelinek authored
As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 the const_ilog2 macro generates a lot of code which interferes badly with GCC inlining heuristics, until it can be proven that the ilog2 argument can or can't be simplified into a constant. It can be expressed using __builtin_clzll builtin which is supported by GCC 3.4 and later and when used only in the __builtin_constant_p guarded code it ought to always fold back to a constant. Other compilers support the same builtin for many years too. Other option would be to change the const_ilog2 macro, though as the description says it is meant to be used also in C constant expressions, and while GCC will fold it to constant with constant argument even in those, perhaps it is better to avoid using extensions in that case. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120125154.GB3040@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201021132718.GB2176@tucnakSigned-off-by:
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
Test get_option() for a starter which is provided by cmdline.c. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning by constifying cmdline_test_values] [andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com: type of expected returned values should be int] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201116104244.15472-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com [andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com: provide meaningful MODULE_LICENSE()] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201116104257.15527-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112180732.75589-6-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
In the future we would like to use get_option() to only validate the string and parse it separately. To achieve this, allow NULL to be an output for get_option(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112180732.75589-5-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Andy Shevchenko authored
When string doesn't have an integer and starts from hyphen get_option() may return interesting results. Fix it to return 0. The simple_strtoull() is used due to absence of simple_strtoul() in a boot code on some architectures. Note, the Fixes tag below is rather for anthropological curiosity. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112180732.75589-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Fixes: f6856583 ("Import 2.4.0-test2pre3") Signed-off-by:
-
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior authored
On PREEMPT_RT the locks are quite different so they can't be tested as it is done below. The alternative is to test for the waitlock within rtmutex. This is the bare minimun to get it compiled. Problems which exist on PREEMP_RT: - none of the locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t, mutex_t, rw_semaphore) may be acquired with disabled preemption or interrupts. If I read the code correct the it is possible to acquire a mutex_t with disabled interrupts. I don't know how to obtain a lock pointer. Technically they are not exported to userland. - memory can not be allocated with disabled preemption or interrupts even with GFP_ATOMIC. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201028181041.xyeothhkouc3p4md@linutronix.deSigned-off-by:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
Use array_size() helper instead of the open-coded version in jhash2(). These sorts of multiplication factors need to be wrapped in array_size(). Also, use the preferred form for passing the size of an object type. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cb8a682e4bba4dbddd2bd8aca7f8c02fea89639b.1601565471.git.gustavoars@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
Make use of the flex_array_size() helper to calculate the size of a flexible array member within an enclosing structure. This helper offers defense-in-depth against potential integer overflows, while at the same time makes it explicitly clear that we are dealing with a flexible array member. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/186e37fe07196ee41a0e562fa8a8cb7a01112ec5.1601565471.git.gustavoars@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
Patch series "lib/stackdepot.c: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member". This series aims to replace a one-element array with a flexible-array member. Also, make use of the struct_size(), flexible_array_size() and array_size() helpers. This patch (of 3): There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct stack_record, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1601565471.git.gustavoars@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f75876b.x9zdN10esiC0qLHV%25lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2f1e6a17aaa891ad9c58817cf0a10b8ab8894f59.1601565471.git.gustavoars@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
The test module to check that free_pages() does not leak memory does not provide any feedback whatsoever its state or progress, but may take some time on slow machines. Add the printing of messages upon starting each phase of the test, and upon completion. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201018140445.20972-1-geert@linux-m68k.orgSigned-off-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Ma, Jianpeng authored
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/BN7PR11MB26097166B6B46387D8A1ABA4FDE30@BN7PR11MB2609.namprd11.prod.outlook.com Fixes: 2afe27c7 ("lib/bitmap.c: bitmap_[empty,full]: remove code duplication") Signed-off-by:
Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@intel.com> Acked-by:
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
