1. 04 May, 2015 34 commits
  2. 03 May, 2015 1 commit
  3. 30 Apr, 2015 5 commits
    • Gerald Schaefer's avatar
      mm/hugetlb: use pmd_page() in follow_huge_pmd() · 43ee6fcf
      Gerald Schaefer authored
      commit 97534127 upstream.
      
      Commit 61f77eda ("mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around
      follow_huge_*") broke follow_huge_pmd() on s390, where pmd and pte
      layout differ and using pte_page() on a huge pmd will return wrong
      results.  Using pmd_page() instead fixes this.
      
      All architectures that were touched by that commit have pmd_page()
      defined, so this should not break anything on other architectures.
      
      Fixes: 61f77eda "mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around follow_huge_*"
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      43ee6fcf
    • Len Brown's avatar
      sched/idle/x86: Restore mwait_idle() to fix boot hangs, to improve power... · 257ccf0a
      Len Brown authored
      sched/idle/x86: Restore mwait_idle() to fix boot hangs, to improve power savings and to improve performance
      
      commit b253149b upstream.
      
      In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
      
        69fb3676 ("x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and "idle=mwait" cmdline param")
      
      The reasoning was that modern machines should be sufficiently
      happy during the boot process using the default_idle() HALT
      loop, until cpuidle loads and either acpi_idle or intel_idle
      invoke the newer MWAIT-with-hints idle loop.
      
      But two machines reported problems:
      
       1. Certain Core2-era machines support MWAIT-C1 and HALT only.
          MWAIT-C1 is preferred for optimal power and performance.
          But if they support just C1, cpuidle never loads and
          so they use the boot-time default idle loop forever.
      
       2. Some laptops will boot-hang if HALT is used,
          but will boot successfully if MWAIT is used.
          This appears to be a hidden assumption in BIOS SMI,
          that is presumably valid on the proprietary OS
          where the BIOS was validated.
      
             https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60770
      
      So here we effectively revert the patch above, restoring
      the mwait_idle() loop.  However, we don't bother restoring
      the idle=mwait cmdline parameter, since it appears to add
      no value.
      
      Maintainer notes:
      
        For 3.9, simply revert 69fb3676
        for 3.10, patch -F3 applies, fuzz needed due to __cpuinit use in
        context For 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, this patch applies cleanly
      Tested-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Ian Malone <ibmalone@gmail.com>
      Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/345254a551eb5a6a866e048d7ab570fd2193aca4.1389763084.git.len.brown@intel.com
      [ Ported to recent kernels. ]
      [ Mike: 3.10 backport ]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      257ccf0a
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after extent_same ioctl · 2034243f
      Filipe Manana authored
      commit 113e8283 upstream.
      
      If we pass a length of 0 to the extent_same ioctl, we end up locking an
      extent range with a start offset greater then its end offset (if the
      destination file's offset is greater than zero). This results in a warning
      from extent_io.c:insert_state through the following call chain:
      
        btrfs_extent_same()
          btrfs_double_lock()
            lock_extent_range()
              lock_extent(inode->io_tree, offset, offset + len - 1)
                lock_extent_bits()
                  __set_extent_bit()
                    insert_state()
                      --> WARN_ON(end < start)
      
      This leads to an infinite loop when evicting the inode. This is the same
      problem that my previous patch titled
      "Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it" addressed
      but for the extent_same ioctl instead of the clone ioctl.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      2034243f
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix inode eviction infinite loop after cloning into it · 4ab0f403
      Filipe Manana authored
      commit ccccf3d6 upstream.
      
      If we attempt to clone a 0 length region into a file we can end up
      inserting a range in the inode's extent_io tree with a start offset
      that is greater then the end offset, which triggers immediately the
      following warning:
      
      [ 3914.619057] WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 4199 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
      [ 3914.620886] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
      (...)
      [ 3914.638093] Call Trace:
      [ 3914.638636]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
      [ 3914.639620]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
      [ 3914.640789]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
      [ 3914.642041]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
      [ 3914.643236]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
      [ 3914.644441]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
      [ 3914.645711]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
      [ 3914.646914]  [<ffffffff8142b2fb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x28/0x33
      [ 3914.648058]  [<ffffffffa03cbac4>] ? test_range_bit+0xcc/0xde [btrfs]
      [ 3914.650105]  [<ffffffffa03cb3c3>] lock_extent+0x13/0x15 [btrfs]
      [ 3914.651361]  [<ffffffffa03db39e>] lock_extent_range+0x3d/0xcd [btrfs]
      [ 3914.652761]  [<ffffffffa03de1fe>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x278/0x388 [btrfs]
      [ 3914.654128]  [<ffffffff811226dd>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
      [ 3914.655320]  [<ffffffffa03e0909>] btrfs_ioctl+0xb51/0x2195 [btrfs]
      (...)
      [ 3914.669271] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc1 ]---
      
      This later makes the inode eviction handler enter an infinite loop that
      keeps dumping the following warning over and over:
      
      [ 3915.117629] WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 4228 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:435 insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]()
      [ 3915.119913] BTRFS: end < start 4095 4096
      (...)
      [ 3915.137394] Call Trace:
      [ 3915.137913]  [<ffffffff81425fd9>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
      [ 3915.139154]  [<ffffffff81045390>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
      [ 3915.140316]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] ? insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
      [ 3915.141505]  [<ffffffff810453f0>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
      [ 3915.142709]  [<ffffffffa03ca44f>] insert_state+0x4b/0x10b [btrfs]
      [ 3915.143849]  [<ffffffffa03ca729>] __set_extent_bit+0x107/0x3f4 [btrfs]
      [ 3915.145120]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] ? btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
      [ 3915.146352]  [<ffffffff811548f6>] ? deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x50
      [ 3915.147565]  [<ffffffffa03cb256>] lock_extent_bits+0x65/0x1bf [btrfs]
      [ 3915.148785]  [<ffffffff8142b7e2>] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x28/0x33
      [ 3915.149931]  [<ffffffffa03bc325>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x196/0x482 [btrfs]
      [ 3915.151154]  [<ffffffff81168904>] evict+0xa0/0x148
      [ 3915.152094]  [<ffffffff811689e5>] dispose_list+0x39/0x43
      [ 3915.153081]  [<ffffffff81169564>] evict_inodes+0xdc/0xeb
      [ 3915.154062]  [<ffffffff81154418>] generic_shutdown_super+0x49/0xef
      [ 3915.155193]  [<ffffffff811546d1>] kill_anon_super+0x13/0x1e
      [ 3915.156274]  [<ffffffffa038c1e3>] btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x23 [btrfs]
      (...)
      [ 3915.167404] ---[ end trace 14843d3e2e622fc2 ]---
      
      So just bail out of the clone ioctl if the length of the region to clone
      is zero, without locking any extent range, in order to prevent this issue
      (same behaviour as a pwrite with a 0 length for example).
      
      This is trivial to reproduce. For example, the steps for the test I just
      made for fstests:
      
        mkfs.btrfs -f SCRATCH_DEV
        mount SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
      
        touch $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
        touch $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
      
        $CLONER_PROG -s 0 -d 4096 -l 0 $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
        umount $SCRATCH_MNT
      
      A test case for fstests follows soon.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      4ab0f403
    • David Sterba's avatar
      btrfs: don't accept bare namespace as a valid xattr · a60903bf
      David Sterba authored
      commit 3c3b04d1 upstream.
      
      Due to insufficient check in btrfs_is_valid_xattr, this unexpectedly
      works:
      
       $ touch file
       $ setfattr -n user. -v 1 file
       $ getfattr -d file
      user.="1"
      
      ie. the missing attribute name after the namespace.
      
      Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94291Reported-by: default avatarWilliam Douglas <william.douglas@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      a60903bf