Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
M
mariadb
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
mariadb
Commits
169ecafd
Commit
169ecafd
authored
Mar 05, 2002
by
unknown
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Plain Diff
Merge work:/home/bk/mysql-4.0
into mysql.sashanet.com:/reiser-data/mysql-4.0 Docs/manual.texi: Auto merged
parents
d2e442f5
cc1ad5ea
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
34 additions
and
6 deletions
+34
-6
Docs/manual.texi
Docs/manual.texi
+34
-6
No files found.
Docs/manual.texi
View file @
169ecafd
...
...
@@ -23430,7 +23430,7 @@ check @code{Slave_open_temp_tables} variable to see if it is 0, then issue
with @code{SLAVE START} and see
if you have better luck next time. There will be a cleaner solution, but it
has to wait until version 4.0.
In earlier versions temporary tables are not
being
replicated properly - we
In earlier versions temporary tables are not replicated properly - we
recommend that you either upgrade, or execute @code{SET SQL_LOG_BIN=0} on
your clients before all queries with temp tables.
@item
...
...
@@ -23503,11 +23503,6 @@ and @code{FLUSH SLAVE} commands. In Version 3.23.26 we have renamed them to
what they do. The old @code{FLUSH} variants still work, though, for
compatibility.
@item
Starting in Version 3.23.21, you can use @code{LOAD TABLE FROM MASTER} for
network backup and to set up replication initially. We have recently
received a number of bug reports concerning it that we are investigating, so
we recommend that you use it only in testing until we make it more stable.
@item
Starting in Version 3.23.23, you can change masters and adjust log position
with @code{CHANGE MASTER TO}.
...
...
@@ -23521,6 +23516,39 @@ with a different name on the slave.
@item
Starting in Version 3.23.28, you can use @code{PURGE MASTER LOGS TO 'log-name'}
to get rid of old logs while the slave is running.
@item
Due to the non-transactional nature of MyISAM tables, it is possible to have
a query that will only partially update a table and return an error code. This
can happen, for example, on a multi-row insert that has one row violating a
key constraint, or if a long update query is killed after updating some of the
rows. If that happens on the master, the slave thread will exit and wait for
the DBA to decide what to do about it unless the error code is legitimate and
the query execution results in the same error code. If this error code
validation behaviour is not desirable, some ( or all) errors could be masked
out with @code{slave-skip-errors} option starting in Version 3.23.47.
@item
While individual tables can be excluded from replication with
@code{replicate-do-table}/@code{replicate-ignore-table} or
@code{replicate-wild-do-table}/@code{replicate-wild-ignore-table}, there
are currently some design deficiencies that in some rather rare cases
produce unexpected results. The replication protocol does not inform the
slave explicitly which tables are going to be modified by the query - so
the slave has to parse the query to know this. To avoid redundant
parsing for queries that will end up actually being executed, table
exclusion is currently implemented by sending the query to the standard
MySQL parser, which will short-circuit the query and report success if
it detects that the table should be ignored. In addition to several
inefficiencies, this approach is also more bug prone, and there are two
known bugs as of Version 3.23.49 - because the parser automatically opens
the table when parsing some queries the ignored table has to exist on
the slave. The other bug is that if the ignored table gets partially
updated, the slave thread will not notice that the table actually should
have been ignored and will suspend the replication process. While the
above bugs are conceptually very simple to fix, we have not yet found a way
to do this without a sigficant code change that would compromize the stability
status of 3.23 branch. There exists a workaround for both if in the rare case
it happens to affect your application - use @code{slave-skip-errors}.
@end itemize
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment