Commit 923003f9 authored by Marko Mäkelä's avatar Marko Mäkelä

ibuf_set_del_mark(): Do not complain about already delete-marked records.

According to a comment in row_upd_sec_index_entry(), it is a
legitimate situation that can be caused by a lock wait.
parent 6dfc85f0
......@@ -3997,21 +3997,22 @@ ibuf_set_del_mark(
rec = page_cur_get_rec(&page_cur);
page_zip = page_cur_get_page_zip(&page_cur);
if (UNIV_UNLIKELY
(rec_get_deleted_flag(
/* Delete mark the old index record. According to a
comment in row_upd_sec_index_entry(), it can already
have been delete marked if a lock wait occurred in
row_ins_index_entry() in a previous invocation of
row_upd_sec_index_entry(). */
if (UNIV_LIKELY
(!rec_get_deleted_flag(
rec, dict_table_is_comp(index->table)))) {
ut_print_timestamp(stderr);
fputs(" InnoDB: record is already delete-marked\n",
stderr);
goto failure;
btr_cur_set_deleted_flag_for_ibuf(rec, page_zip,
TRUE, mtr);
}
btr_cur_set_deleted_flag_for_ibuf(rec, page_zip, TRUE, mtr);
} else {
ut_print_timestamp(stderr);
fputs(" InnoDB: unable to find a record to delete-mark\n",
stderr);
failure:
fputs("InnoDB: tuple ", stderr);
dtuple_print(stderr, entry);
fputs("\n"
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment