Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
G
gitlab-ce
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Léo-Paul Géneau
gitlab-ce
Commits
f7faaf5c
Commit
f7faaf5c
authored
Oct 29, 2018
by
Robert Speicher
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Document implicit feature flag checks
parent
44a6b8d4
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
23 additions
and
10 deletions
+23
-10
doc/development/rolling_out_changes_using_feature_flags.md
doc/development/rolling_out_changes_using_feature_flags.md
+23
-10
No files found.
doc/development/rolling_out_changes_using_feature_flags.md
View file @
f7faaf5c
...
...
@@ -152,14 +152,31 @@ in RC1, followed by the feature flag being removed in RC2. This in turn means
the feature will be stable by the time we publish a stable package around the
22nd of the month.
##
Undefined feature flags default to "on"
##
Implicit feature flags
By default, t
he
[
`Project#feature_available?`
][
project-fa
]
,
T
he
[
`Project#feature_available?`
][
project-fa
]
,
[
`Namespace#feature_available?`
][
namespace-fa
]
(EE), and
[
`License.feature_available?`
][
license-fa
]
(EE) methods will check if the
specified feature is behind a feature flag. Unless the feature is explicitly
disabled or limited to a percentage of users, the feature flag check will
default to
`true`
.
[
`License.feature_available?`
][
license-fa
]
(EE) methods all implicitly check for
a feature flag by the same name as the provided argument.
For example if a feature is license-gated, there's no need to add an additional
explicit feature flag check since the flag will be checked as part of the
`License.feature_available?`
call. Similarly, there's no need to "clean up" a
feature flag once the feature has reached general availability.
You'd still want to use an explicit
`Feature.enabled?`
check if your new feature
isn't gated by a License or Plan.
[
project-fa
]:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/blob/4cc1c62918aa4c31750cb21dfb1a6c3492d71080/app/models/project_feature.rb#L63-68
[
namespace-fa
]:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/blob/4cc1c62918aa4c31750cb21dfb1a6c3492d71080/ee/app/models/ee/namespace.rb#L71-85
[
license-fa
]:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/blob/4cc1c62918aa4c31750cb21dfb1a6c3492d71080/ee/app/models/license.rb#L293-300
### Undefined feature flags default to "on"
An important side-effect of the
[
implicit feature
flags
][
#implicit-feature-flags
]
mentioned above is that unless the feature is
explicitly disabled or limited to a percentage of users, the feature flag check
will default to
`true`
.
As an example, if you were to ship the backend half of a feature behind a flag,
you'd want to explicitly disable that flag until the frontend half is also ready
...
...
@@ -171,7 +188,3 @@ to be shipped. You can do this via ChatOps:
Note that you can do this at any time, even before the merge request using the
flag has been merged!
[
project-fa
]:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/blob/4cc1c62918aa4c31750cb21dfb1a6c3492d71080/app/models/project_feature.rb#L63-68
[
namespace-fa
]:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/blob/4cc1c62918aa4c31750cb21dfb1a6c3492d71080/ee/app/models/ee/namespace.rb#L71-85
[
license-fa
]:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/blob/4cc1c62918aa4c31750cb21dfb1a6c3492d71080/ee/app/models/license.rb#L293-300
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment