- 02 Dec, 2016 2 commits
-
-
DJ Mountney authored
This is useful for when runner is bundled with gitlab, like in a kubernetes stack, and we want the runner to be able to register with gitlab as soon as they both come up.
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
Replace static fixture for notes_spec ## What does this MR do? Replace `comments.html.haml` and `issue_note.html.haml` used in `notes_spec.js` by dynamically created fixture. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #24753 See merge request !7683
-
- 01 Dec, 2016 38 commits
-
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
24726 Remove Across GitLab from side navigation ## What does this MR do? Removes Across GitLab header from side navigation ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-12-01_at_11.09.12_AM](/uploads/7a8c32a1736a55e0baedf071c21e98db/Screen_Shot_2016-12-01_at_11.09.12_AM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-12-01_at_11.09.02_AM](/uploads/4d095ec6e4e756abf0301678bb40d59b/Screen_Shot_2016-12-01_at_11.09.02_AM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24726 See merge request !7883
-
tauriedavis authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Pipelines tabs ## What does this MR do? Changes the URL when the builds tab is clicked making it possible to be shared. 1. Adds a standard way to handle linked tabs: * This behaviour is already present in the merge requests, commit and user `show` page. * This MR introduces a reusable way to accomplish this behaviour for pages with static content. 2. Adds test: * For the linked tabs reusable class * For the pipelines tabs ## Why was this MR needed? To allow having a sharable URL that represented the opened tab ![tabs](/uploads/91e663c12c6e9ac46a17aa3a9489dc72/tabs.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24814 See merge request !7709
-
Fatih Acet authored
Replace static fixture for right_sidebar_spec ## What does this MR do? Replace `right_sidebar.html.haml` for `right_sidebar_spec.js` by already existing dynamically generated fixture. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #24753 See merge request !7687
-
Fatih Acet authored
Resolve "User-generated permalink IDs collide with GitLab interface" ## What does this MR do? Prevents ID values automatically generated by headers in [GitLab Flavored Markdown](https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/blob/master/doc/user/markdown.md#header-ids-and-links) from colliding with IDs used elsewhere in the GitLab interface. This can cause confusion when, for instance, a selector looks for a merge request tab with `id="pipelines"` and there is a header with the same ID earlier in the DOM. How this works: * All header IDs generated with GitLab Flavored Markdown are namespaced with `id="user-content_foo"` * All anchor links which point to these IDs continue to use the non-namespaced hash `<a href="#foo">...</a>` * When a page is loaded or when the `hashchange` event is triggered, javascript will automatically search for `#user-content_foo` if `#foo` cannot be found, and scroll to that position instead. ## Before ![2016-11-21-13.00.28](/uploads/e3be2cd6a9142dfd6e64db5462a6aa76/2016-11-21-13.00.28.gif) ## After: ![2016-11-21-13.12.45](/uploads/f7ae3f3a30c91325eaa3665591b6a850/2016-11-21-13.12.45.gif) ![2016-11-21-13.03.00](/uploads/3a6a782c081ecaa05b8781548d794909/2016-11-21-13.03.00.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #22781 See also prior attempts to address this issue: #3908, !2023, !2024 See merge request !7631
-
Fatih Acet authored
Remove the help text under the sidebar subscribe button and style it inline ## What does this MR do? Remove the help text under the sidebar subscribe button and style it inline ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Current help text is over obvious and pushes references too far down. Also the subscribe button is now consistently styled and not a complete block button anymore. approved by @awhildy ## Screenshots (if relevant) before: ![image](/uploads/0c9543d2bf184a73b65773caa5f9fc62/image.png) after: ![image](/uploads/765338823376267427f4a16737e39998/image.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24281 See merge request !7389
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Resolve "Improper use of bootstrap media query variables" ## What does this MR do? Corrects media queries which are off by `1px` due to incorrect `$screen-{xs,sm,md,lg}-min` usage. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Ensure none of these errors were somehow intentional (I can't imagine a legitimate use case for `@media (max-width: $screen-sm-min)` though) ## Why was this MR needed? When "min" breakpoints are used for "max-width" media queries, they create an overlap in rule breakpoints. For instance in the following scenario: ```scss .foo { @media (min-width: $screen-sm-min) { width: 100px; padding: 0; } @media (max-width: $screen-sm-min) { padding: 10px 0; } } ``` If the viewport were set to exactly `$screen-sm-min` pixels, both of these media queries would apply. It is important to use `max-width: $screen-xs-max` in this case which is equal to `$screen-sm-min - 1`. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] ~~[Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added~~ - [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ - [ ] ~~API support added~~ - Tests - [ ] ~~Added for this feature/bug~~ - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #25198 See merge request !7863
-
Alejandro Rodríguez authored
[ci skip]
-
Fatih Acet authored
Resolve "missing design for wiki page" ### To Do: - [x] Move page navigation from sub-menu to sidebar menu - [x] Update wiki page header - [x] Update wiki edit page actions and header - [x] Update `Git access` page design - [ ] ~~Add search to sidebar navigation~~ ### Screen Shots: #### `@media (min-width: $screen-lg)` ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.25.47_PM](/uploads/2efc59639ac53d69808e78a8ba65fcbf/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.25.47_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.25.36_PM](/uploads/bb7e93558335edf4216082cc1ac3f8f5/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.25.36_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.26.43_PM](/uploads/c2dce7cff05680b9a03438ec7d9967b4/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.26.43_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.26.05_PM](/uploads/7dbae25bfc93fb2f01cd231db0cb47d3/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.26.05_PM.png) #### `@media (min-width: $screen-md)` ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.28.18_PM](/uploads/4fdcc8c88c38093ea5a4fe0b22b79acf/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.28.18_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.28.21_PM](/uploads/ce84a51fdc0623b2b192d8334c2c2f6d/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.28.21_PM.png) #### `@media (min-width: $screen-sm)` ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.28.05_PM](/uploads/cf612a36259c248ca597a0850546fe75/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.28.05_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.28.08_PM](/uploads/ae4374f9968c1cc064242fde3ad0e214/Screen_Shot_2016-11-16_at_12.28.08_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #18546 See merge request !7429
-
Sean McGivern authored
Fix GitHub importer to import PR where source repo/fork was renamed/deleted Closes #24594 See merge request !7865
-
Sean McGivern authored
Fix URL rewritting in the Help section Closes #25199 See merge request !7875
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
Replace static fixture for shortcuts_issuable_spec ## What does this MR do? Replace `issuable.html.haml` for `shortcuts_issuable_spec.js` by already existing dynamically generated fixture. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #24753 See merge request !7685
-
Stan Hu authored
Make deleting with optimistic locking respect NULL Make deleting with optimistic locking respect NULL For now deleting with optimistic locking is broken when lock_version is still NULL, because Rails would try to delete with `lock_version = 0` while in the database the column is still `NULL`. The monkey patches would force Rails just pass whatever in the column, and stop Rails from casting `NULL` into `0` when the value is read from database. Closes #24766 See merge request !7867
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Resolve "Merge request dashboard page takes over a minute to load" See merge request !7760
-
Stan Hu authored
Gracefully recover from Redis connection failures in Sidekiq initializer Precompiling assets and other Rake tasks would fail if Redis were not available in certain cases. * Closes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#25143 * Closes gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab#1743 See merge request !7835
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Replace references to MergeRequestDiff#commits with st_commits when we care only about the number of commits See merge request !7668
-
Stan Hu authored
* Closes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#25143 * Closes gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab#1743
-
winniehell authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Document the need to use a PAT with Registry when 2FA is on Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22465 See merge request !7874
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
GitLab 8.12 introduced a new permissions model which tightened the security of Container Registry. It is now required to use a personal token if 2FA is enabled. [ci skip]
-
Sean McGivern authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
Instead of doing n queries for n states, do one query to get all the counts grouped by state, and figure out what the count is for each state is from that. We can still cache the individual counts (it can't hurt), but this will help with initial load. Note that the `opened` scope on `Issuable` includes the `opened` and `reopened` states, which is why there's a special case.
-
Sean McGivern authored
`any?` on an AR relation performs a `SELECT COUNT`, which we don't need. 1. We are very likely to have issues or MRs, so the `SELECT COUNT` is often unnecessary. 2. Even where there are no items returned, the overhead of the `SELECT *` instead of `SELECT COUNT` is relatively small. Calling `to_a` on the relation lets us use `Enumerable#any?`, which will return immediately if there are objects returned.
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Small refactor of webhooks docs See merge request !7872
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Clarify that a commit SHA doesn't work for CI triggers Related https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22029 See merge request !7871
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Fix wrong link in builds artifacts admin docs Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23168 See merge request !7870
-
Adam Niedzielski authored
when we care only about the number of commits We do not have to instantiate all objects in this case.
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Only include EmailHelpers in mailer specs and specs using them See merge request !7836
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Remove an order dependency in LabelsFinder specs Makes the LabelsFinder spec expectations order-independent There is an explicit ordering to `LabelsFinder` - title ascending - but two of the labels (a group label and a project label) have the same title, so the sort ordering isn't stable for those in all circumstances. It looks like this is intentional. See merge request !7788
-
Sean McGivern authored
Clean up JiraService Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24967 Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24777 See merge request !7756
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Improve the `Gitlab::OAuth::User` error message ## What does this MR do? Fixes a logging issue submitted by a customer at https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/50728. The error saving the user is logged to application.log. Previously, the entry had no context and was unusable - `Error saving user: [Email address already taken]`. Adding the auth hash UID and email makes the error more helpful. For such a small logging change, do we need a changelog entry? See merge request !7851
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
-