Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
C
cython
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Labels
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Commits
Open sidebar
nexedi
cython
Commits
8368fea3
Commit
8368fea3
authored
Sep 26, 2018
by
mattip
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
DOC: describe motivation for the feature
parent
4a8e481a
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
11 additions
and
2 deletions
+11
-2
docs/src/userguide/extension_types.rst
docs/src/userguide/extension_types.rst
+11
-2
No files found.
docs/src/userguide/extension_types.rst
View file @
8368fea3
...
...
@@ -775,8 +775,17 @@ Attribute name matching and aliasing
------------------------------------
Sometimes the type's C struct as specified in ``object_struct_name`` may use
different labels for the fields. For example we may have an extension module
``foo_extension``::
different labels for the fields than those in the ``PyTypeObject``. This can
easily happen in hand-coded C extensions where the ``PyTypeObject_Foo`` has a
getter method, but the name does not match the name in the ``PyFooObject``. In
NumPy, for instance, python-level ``dtype.itemsize`` is a getter for the C
struct field ``elsize``. Cython supports aliasing field names so that one can
write ``dtype.itemsize`` in Cython code which will be compiled into direct
access of the C struct field, without going through a C-API equivalent of
``dtype.__getattr__('itemsize')``.
For example we may have an extension
module ``foo_extension``::
cdef class Foo:
cdef public int field0, field1, field2;
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment