info:To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#designated-technical-writers
---
# Constraints naming conventions
The most common option is to let Rails pick the name for database constraints and indexes or let PostgreSQL use the defaults (when applicable). However, when needing to define custom names in Rails or working in Go applications where no ORM is used, it is important to follow strict naming conventions to improve consistency and discoverability.
The table below describes the naming conventions for custom PostgreSQL constraints.
Please note that the intent is not to retroactively change names in existing databases but rather ensure consistency of future changes.
| **Check Constraint** | `check_<table name>_<column name>[_and_<column name>]*[_<suffix>]?` | The optional suffix should denote the type of validation, such as `length` and `enum`. It can also be used to desambiguate multiple `CHECK` constraints on the same column. | `check_projects_name_length`<br/>`check_projects_type_enum`<br/>`check_projects_admin1_id_and_admin2_id_differ` |
| **Exclusion Constraint** | `excl_<table name>_<column name>[_and_<column name>]*_[_<suffix>]?` | The optional suffix should denote the type of exclusion being performed. | `excl_reservations_start_at_end_at_no_overlap` |
## Observations
- Prefixes are preferred over suffices because they make it easier to identify the type of a given constraint quickly, as well as group them alphabetically;
- The `_and_` that joins column names can be omitted to keep the identifiers under the 63 characters' length limit defined by PostgreSQL. Additionally, the notation may be abbreviated to the best of our ability if struggling to keep under this limit.
