Commit 7892edc8 authored by Amy Qualls's avatar Amy Qualls

Fix awkward pluralization of reviewers feature

Rephrase slightly to avoid an icky collision of a singular feature
that uses a plural construction.
parent e876311b
...@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Requesting a code review is an important part of contributing code. However, dec ...@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Requesting a code review is an important part of contributing code. However, dec
your code and asking for a review are no easy tasks. Using the "assignee" field for both authors and your code and asking for a review are no easy tasks. Using the "assignee" field for both authors and
reviewers makes it hard for others to determine who's doing what on a merge request. reviewers makes it hard for others to determine who's doing what on a merge request.
GitLab Merge Request Reviewers enable you to request a review of your work, and The Merge Request Reviewers feature enables you to request a review of your work, and
see the status of the review. Reviewers help distinguish the roles of the users see the status of the review. Reviewers help distinguish the roles of the users
involved in the merge request. In comparison to an **Assignee**, who is directly involved in the merge request. In comparison to an **Assignee**, who is directly
responsible for creating or merging a merge request, a **Reviewer** is a team member responsible for creating or merging a merge request, a **Reviewer** is a team member
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment