Commit 0110d6f2 authored by Michael S. Tsirkin's avatar Michael S. Tsirkin Committed by David S. Miller

tun: orphan an skb on tx

The following situation was observed in the field:
tap1 sends packets, tap2 does not consume them, as a result
tap1 can not be closed. This happens because
tun/tap devices can hang on to skbs undefinitely.

As noted by Herbert, possible solutions include a timeout followed by a
copy/change of ownership of the skb, or always copying/changing
ownership if we're going into a hostile device.

This patch implements the second approach.

Note: one issue still remaining is that since skbs
keep reference to tun socket and tun socket has a
reference to tun device, we won't flush backlog,
instead simply waiting for all skbs to get transmitted.
At least this is not user-triggerable, and
this was not reported in practice, my assumption is
other devices besides tap complete an skb
within finite time after it has been queued.

A possible solution for the second issue
would not to have socket reference the device,
instead, implement dev->destructor for tun, and
wait for all skbs to complete there, but this
needs some thought, probably too risky for 2.6.34.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarYan Vugenfirer <yvugenfi@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 5c659322
...@@ -387,6 +387,10 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) ...@@ -387,6 +387,10 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
} }
} }
/* Orphan the skb - required as we might hang on to it
* for indefinite time. */
skb_orphan(skb);
/* Enqueue packet */ /* Enqueue packet */
skb_queue_tail(&tun->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue, skb); skb_queue_tail(&tun->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
dev->trans_start = jiffies; dev->trans_start = jiffies;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment