Commit 05bd92dd authored by Shaun Tancheff's avatar Shaun Tancheff Committed by Jens Axboe

block: missing bio_put following submit_bio_wait

submit_bio_wait() gives the caller an opportunity to examine
struct bio and so expects the caller to issue the put_bio()

This fixes a memory leak reported by a few people in 4.7-rc2
kmemleak report after 9082e87b ("block: remove struct bio_batch")
Signed-off-by: default avatarShaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@seagate.com>
Tested-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Larry Finger@lwfinger.net
Tested-by: default avatarDavid Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
parent 87c279e6
......@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
ret = submit_bio_wait(type, bio);
if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
ret = 0;
bio_put(bio);
}
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
......@@ -165,8 +166,10 @@ int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
}
}
if (bio)
if (bio) {
ret = submit_bio_wait(REQ_WRITE | REQ_WRITE_SAME, bio);
bio_put(bio);
}
return ret != -EOPNOTSUPP ? ret : 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_write_same);
......@@ -206,8 +209,11 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
}
}
if (bio)
return submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio);
if (bio) {
ret = submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio);
bio_put(bio);
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment