Commit 06c8581f authored by Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan's avatar Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan Committed by David S. Miller

tipc: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of WQ_UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1

Until now, tipc_rcv and tipc_send workqueues in server are allocated
with parameters WQ_UNBOUND & max_active = 1.
This parameters passed to this function makes it equivalent to
alloc_ordered_workqueue(). The later form is more explicit and
can inherit future ordered_workqueue changes.

In this commit we replace alloc_workqueue() with more readable
alloc_ordered_workqueue().
Acked-by: default avatarYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarParthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent ae245557
......@@ -571,13 +571,13 @@ static void tipc_work_stop(struct tipc_server *s)
static int tipc_work_start(struct tipc_server *s)
{
s->rcv_wq = alloc_workqueue("tipc_rcv", WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
s->rcv_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("tipc_rcv", 0);
if (!s->rcv_wq) {
pr_err("can't start tipc receive workqueue\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
s->send_wq = alloc_workqueue("tipc_send", WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
s->send_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("tipc_send", 0);
if (!s->send_wq) {
pr_err("can't start tipc send workqueue\n");
destroy_workqueue(s->rcv_wq);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment