KVM: s390: use defines for execution controls
Let's replace the bitmasks by defines. Reconstructed from code, comments and commit messages. Tried to keep the defines short and map them to feature names. In case they don't completely map to features, keep them in the stye of ICTL defines. This effectively drops all "U" from the existing numbers. I think this should be fine (as similarly done for e.g. ICTL defines). I am not 100% sure about the ECA_MVPGI and ECA_PROTEXCI bits as they are always used in pairs. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170313104828.13362-1-david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> [some renames, add one missing place]
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment