Commit 0fb871cc authored by Lance Roy's avatar Lance Roy Committed by John Johansen

apparmor: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep

lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: default avatarLance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
parent ab9f2115
...@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void update_file_ctx(struct aa_file_ctx *fctx, struct aa_label *label, ...@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void update_file_ctx(struct aa_file_ctx *fctx, struct aa_label *label,
/* update caching of label on file_ctx */ /* update caching of label on file_ctx */
spin_lock(&fctx->lock); spin_lock(&fctx->lock);
old = rcu_dereference_protected(fctx->label, old = rcu_dereference_protected(fctx->label,
spin_is_locked(&fctx->lock)); lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
l = aa_label_merge(old, label, GFP_ATOMIC); l = aa_label_merge(old, label, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (l) { if (l) {
if (l != old) { if (l != old) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment