Commit 19c76303 authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor()

We can't take a big lock around __cpufreq_governor() as this causes
recursive locking for some cases. But calls to this routine must be
serialized for every policy. Otherwise we can see some unpredictable
events.

For example, consider following scenario:

__cpufreq_remove_dev()
 __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
   policy->governor->governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
    cpufreq_governor_dbs()
     case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:
      mutex_destroy(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex)
      cpu_cdbs->cur_policy = NULL;
  <PREEMPT>
store()
 __cpufreq_set_policy()
  __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
    policy->governor->governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
     case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
      mutex_lock(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex); <-- Warning (destroyed mutex)
       if (policy->max < cpu_cdbs->cur_policy->cur) <- cur_policy == NULL

And so store() will eventually result in a crash if cur_policy is
NULL at this point.

Introduce an additional variable which would guarantee serialization
here.
Reported-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent f73d3933
......@@ -1692,13 +1692,15 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
policy->cpu, event);
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
if (policy->governor_busy
|| (policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
|| (!policy->governor_enabled
&& (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS || event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))) {
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
return -EBUSY;
}
policy->governor_busy = true;
if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
policy->governor_enabled = false;
else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
......@@ -1727,6 +1729,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT) && !ret))
module_put(policy->governor->owner);
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
policy->governor_busy = false;
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
return ret;
}
......
......@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
struct cpufreq_governor *governor; /* see below */
void *governor_data;
bool governor_enabled; /* governor start/stop flag */
bool governor_busy;
struct work_struct update; /* if update_policy() needs to be
* called, but you're in IRQ context */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment