Commit 1dfffa00 authored by Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's avatar Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Committed by Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Don't disable interrupts independently of the lock

The locks (active.lock and rq->lock) need to be taken with disabled
interrupts. This is done in i915_request_retire() by disabling the
interrupts independently of the locks itself.
While local_irq_disable()+spin_lock() equals spin_lock_irq() on vanilla
it does not on PREEMPT_RT.
Chris Wilson confirmed that local_irq_disable() was just introduced as
an optimisation to avoid enabling/disabling interrupts during
lock/unlock combo.

Enable/disable interrupts as part of the locking instruction.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191017161352.e5z3ugse7gxl5ari@linutronix.de
parent e9768bfe
...@@ -206,14 +206,14 @@ static void remove_from_engine(struct i915_request *rq) ...@@ -206,14 +206,14 @@ static void remove_from_engine(struct i915_request *rq)
* check that the rq still belongs to the newly locked engine. * check that the rq still belongs to the newly locked engine.
*/ */
locked = READ_ONCE(rq->engine); locked = READ_ONCE(rq->engine);
spin_lock(&locked->active.lock); spin_lock_irq(&locked->active.lock);
while (unlikely(locked != (engine = READ_ONCE(rq->engine)))) { while (unlikely(locked != (engine = READ_ONCE(rq->engine)))) {
spin_unlock(&locked->active.lock); spin_unlock(&locked->active.lock);
spin_lock(&engine->active.lock); spin_lock(&engine->active.lock);
locked = engine; locked = engine;
} }
list_del(&rq->sched.link); list_del(&rq->sched.link);
spin_unlock(&locked->active.lock); spin_unlock_irq(&locked->active.lock);
} }
bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq) bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
...@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq) ...@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
&i915_request_timeline(rq)->requests)); &i915_request_timeline(rq)->requests));
rq->ring->head = rq->postfix; rq->ring->head = rq->postfix;
local_irq_disable();
/* /*
* We only loosely track inflight requests across preemption, * We only loosely track inflight requests across preemption,
* and so we may find ourselves attempting to retire a _completed_ * and so we may find ourselves attempting to retire a _completed_
...@@ -252,7 +250,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq) ...@@ -252,7 +250,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
*/ */
remove_from_engine(rq); remove_from_engine(rq);
spin_lock(&rq->lock); spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
i915_request_mark_complete(rq); i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
if (!i915_request_signaled(rq)) if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
dma_fence_signal_locked(&rq->fence); dma_fence_signal_locked(&rq->fence);
...@@ -267,9 +265,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq) ...@@ -267,9 +265,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
__notify_execute_cb(rq); __notify_execute_cb(rq);
} }
GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb));
spin_unlock(&rq->lock); spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
local_irq_enable();
remove_from_client(rq); remove_from_client(rq);
list_del(&rq->link); list_del(&rq->link);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment