Commit 2f268f12 authored by Veaceslav Falico's avatar Veaceslav Falico Committed by David S. Miller

net: add adj_list to save only neighbours

Currently, we distinguish neighbours (first-level linked devices) from
non-neighbours by the neighbour bool in the netdev_adjacent. This could be
quite time-consuming in case we would like to traverse *only* through
neighbours - cause we'd have to traverse through all devices and check for
this flag, and in a (quite common) scenario where we have lots of vlans on
top of bridge, which is on top of a bond - the bonding would have to go
through all those vlans to get its upper neighbour linked devices.

This situation is really unpleasant, cause there are already a lot of cases
when a device with slaves needs to go through them in hot path.

To fix this, introduce a new upper/lower device lists structure -
adj_list, which contains only the neighbours. It works always in
pair with the all_adj_list structure (renamed from upper/lower_dev_list),
i.e. both of them contain the same links, only that all_adj_list contains
also non-neighbour device links. It's really a small change visible,
currently, only for __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert/remove(), and doesn't
change the main linked logic at all.

Also, add some comments a fix a name collision in
netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu() and rework the naming by the following
rules:

netdev_(all_)(upper|lower)_*

If "all_" is present, then we work with the whole list of upper/lower
devices, otherwise - only with direct neighbours. Uninline functions - to
get better stack traces.

CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 7863c054
......@@ -1019,7 +1019,7 @@ static void alb_send_learning_packets(struct slave *slave, u8 mac_addr[])
/* loop through vlans and send one packet for each */
rcu_read_lock();
netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
if (upper->priv_flags & IFF_802_1Q_VLAN)
alb_send_lp_vid(slave, mac_addr,
vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper));
......
......@@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@ static bool bond_has_this_ip(struct bonding *bond, __be32 ip)
return true;
rcu_read_lock();
netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
if (ip == bond_confirm_addr(upper, 0, ip)) {
ret = true;
break;
......@@ -2342,10 +2342,12 @@ static void bond_arp_send_all(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
*
* TODO: QinQ?
*/
netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, vlan_upper, vlan_iter) {
netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, vlan_upper,
vlan_iter) {
if (!is_vlan_dev(vlan_upper))
continue;
netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu(vlan_upper, upper, iter) {
netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(vlan_upper, upper,
iter) {
if (upper == rt->dst.dev) {
vlan_id = vlan_dev_vlan_id(vlan_upper);
rcu_read_unlock();
......@@ -2358,7 +2360,7 @@ static void bond_arp_send_all(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
* our upper vlans, then just search for any dev that
* matches, and in case it's a vlan - save the id
*/
netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(bond->dev, upper, iter) {
if (upper == rt->dst.dev) {
/* if it's a vlan - get its VID */
if (is_vlan_dev(upper))
......
......@@ -1143,8 +1143,18 @@ struct net_device {
struct list_head dev_list;
struct list_head napi_list;
struct list_head unreg_list;
struct list_head upper_dev_list; /* List of upper devices */
struct list_head lower_dev_list;
/* directly linked devices, like slaves for bonding */
struct {
struct list_head upper;
struct list_head lower;
} adj_list;
/* all linked devices, *including* neighbours */
struct {
struct list_head upper;
struct list_head lower;
} all_adj_list;
/* currently active device features */
......@@ -2813,15 +2823,15 @@ extern int bpf_jit_enable;
extern bool netdev_has_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev,
struct net_device *upper_dev);
extern bool netdev_has_any_upper_dev(struct net_device *dev);
extern struct net_device *netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
extern struct net_device *netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(struct net_device *dev,
struct list_head **iter);
/* iterate through upper list, must be called under RCU read lock */
#define netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu(dev, upper, iter) \
for (iter = &(dev)->upper_dev_list, \
upper = netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \
upper; \
upper = netdev_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
#define netdev_for_each_all_upper_dev_rcu(dev, updev, iter) \
for (iter = &(dev)->all_adj_list.upper, \
updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)); \
updev; \
updev = netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu(dev, &(iter)))
extern struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get(struct net_device *dev);
extern struct net_device *netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(struct net_device *dev);
......
This diff is collapsed.
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment