nsfs: unobfuscate

1) IS_ERR(p) && PTR_ERR(p) == -E... is spelled p == ERR_PTR(-E...)
2) yes, you can open-code do-while and sometimes there's even
a good reason to do so.  Not in this case, though.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

fs/nsfs.c

@@ -105,17 +105,16 @@ static void *__ns_get_path(struct path *path, struct ns_common *ns)
 void *ns_get_path_cb(struct path *path, ns_get_path_helper_t *ns_get_cb,
 		     void *private_data)
 {
-	struct ns_common *ns;
 	void *ret;
 
-again:
-	ns = ns_get_cb(private_data);
+	do {
+		struct ns_common *ns = ns_get_cb(private_data);
 		if (!ns)
 			return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
 
 		ret = __ns_get_path(path, ns);
-	if (IS_ERR(ret) && PTR_ERR(ret) == -EAGAIN)
-		goto again;
+	} while (ret == ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -154,7 +153,7 @@ int open_related_ns(struct ns_common *ns,
 	if (fd < 0)
 		return fd;
 
-	while (1) {
+	do {
 		struct ns_common *relative;
 
 		relative = get_ns(ns);
@@ -164,10 +163,8 @@ int open_related_ns(struct ns_common *ns,
 		}
 
 		err = __ns_get_path(&path, relative);
-		if (IS_ERR(err) && PTR_ERR(err) == -EAGAIN)
-			continue;
-		break;
-	}
+	} while (err == ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
+
 	if (IS_ERR(err)) {
 		put_unused_fd(fd);
 		return PTR_ERR(err);