drm/i915/skl: Simplify wm structures slightly (v2)
A bunch of SKL watermark-related structures have the cursor plane as a separate entry from the rest of the planes. Since a previous patch updated I915_MAX_PLANES such that those plane arrays now have a slot for the cursor, update the code to use the new slot in the existing plane arrays and kill off the cursor-specific structures. There shouldn't be any functional change here; this is just shuffling around how the data is stored in some of the data structures. The whole patch is generated with Coccinelle via the following semantic patch: @@ struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters WMP; @@ - WMP.cursor + WMP.plane[PLANE_CURSOR] @@ struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *WMP; @@ - WMP->cursor + WMP->plane[PLANE_CURSOR] @@ @@ struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters { ... - struct intel_plane_wm_parameters cursor; ... }; @@ struct skl_ddb_allocation DDB; expression E; @@ - DDB.cursor[E] + DDB.plane[E][PLANE_CURSOR] @@ struct skl_ddb_allocation *DDB; expression E; @@ - DDB->cursor[E] + DDB->plane[E][PLANE_CURSOR] @@ @@ struct skl_ddb_allocation { ... - struct skl_ddb_entry cursor[I915_MAX_PIPES]; ... }; @@ struct skl_wm_values WMV; expression E1, E2; @@ ( - WMV.cursor[E1][E2] + WMV.plane[E1][PLANE_CURSOR][E2] | - WMV.cursor_trans[E1] + WMV.plane_trans[E1][PLANE_CURSOR] ) @@ struct skl_wm_values *WMV; expression E1, E2; @@ ( - WMV->cursor[E1][E2] + WMV->plane[E1][PLANE_CURSOR][E2] | - WMV->cursor_trans[E1] + WMV->plane_trans[E1][PLANE_CURSOR] ) @@ @@ struct skl_wm_values { ... - uint32_t cursor[I915_MAX_PIPES][8]; ... - uint32_t cursor_trans[I915_MAX_PIPES]; ... }; @@ struct skl_wm_level WML; @@ ( - WML.cursor_en + WML.plane_en[PLANE_CURSOR] | - WML.cursor_res_b + WML.plane_res_b[PLANE_CURSOR] | - WML.cursor_res_l + WML.plane_res_l[PLANE_CURSOR] ) @@ struct skl_wm_level *WML; @@ ( - WML->cursor_en + WML->plane_en[PLANE_CURSOR] | - WML->cursor_res_b + WML->plane_res_b[PLANE_CURSOR] | - WML->cursor_res_l + WML->plane_res_l[PLANE_CURSOR] ) @@ @@ struct skl_wm_level { ... - bool cursor_en; ... - uint16_t cursor_res_b; - uint8_t cursor_res_l; ... }; v2: Use a PLANE_CURSOR enum entry rather than making the code reference I915_MAX_PLANES or I915_MAX_PLANES+1, which was confusing. (Ander) Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment