Commit 49f1c330 authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva Committed by Miquel Raynal

mtd: rawnand: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMiquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200226222722.GA18020@embeddedor
parent c6fbcb70
...@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ struct denali_chip { ...@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ struct denali_chip {
struct nand_chip chip; struct nand_chip chip;
struct list_head node; struct list_head node;
unsigned int nsels; unsigned int nsels;
struct denali_chip_sel sels[0]; struct denali_chip_sel sels[];
}; };
/** /**
......
...@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct marvell_nand_chip { ...@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct marvell_nand_chip {
int addr_cyc; int addr_cyc;
int selected_die; int selected_die;
unsigned int nsels; unsigned int nsels;
struct marvell_nand_chip_sel sels[0]; struct marvell_nand_chip_sel sels[];
}; };
static inline struct marvell_nand_chip *to_marvell_nand(struct nand_chip *chip) static inline struct marvell_nand_chip *to_marvell_nand(struct nand_chip *chip)
......
...@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ struct meson_nfc_nand_chip { ...@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ struct meson_nfc_nand_chip {
u8 *data_buf; u8 *data_buf;
__le64 *info_buf; __le64 *info_buf;
u32 nsels; u32 nsels;
u8 sels[0]; u8 sels[];
}; };
struct meson_nand_ecc { struct meson_nand_ecc {
......
...@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ struct mtk_nfc_nand_chip { ...@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ struct mtk_nfc_nand_chip {
u32 spare_per_sector; u32 spare_per_sector;
int nsels; int nsels;
u8 sels[0]; u8 sels[];
/* nothing after this field */ /* nothing after this field */
}; };
......
...@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ...@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
struct hynix_read_retry { struct hynix_read_retry {
int nregs; int nregs;
const u8 *regs; const u8 *regs;
u8 values[0]; u8 values[];
}; };
/** /**
......
...@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct sunxi_nand_chip { ...@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct sunxi_nand_chip {
u32 timing_cfg; u32 timing_cfg;
u32 timing_ctl; u32 timing_ctl;
int nsels; int nsels;
struct sunxi_nand_chip_sel sels[0]; struct sunxi_nand_chip_sel sels[];
}; };
static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand) static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment