Commit 4ceafa33 authored by bsegall@google.com's avatar bsegall@google.com Committed by Ben Hutchings

ptrace: fix PTRACE_LISTEN race corrupting task->state

commit 5402e97a upstream.

In PT_SEIZED + LISTEN mode STOP/CONT signals cause a wakeup against
__TASK_TRACED.  If this races with the ptrace_unfreeze_traced at the end
of a PTRACE_LISTEN, this can wake the task /after/ the check against
__TASK_TRACED, but before the reset of state to TASK_TRACED.  This
causes it to instead clobber TASK_WAKING, allowing a subsequent wakeup
against TRACED while the task is still on the rq wake_list, corrupting
it.

Oleg said:
 "The kernel can crash or this can lead to other hard-to-debug problems.
  In short, "task->state = TASK_TRACED" in ptrace_unfreeze_traced()
  assumes that nobody else can wake it up, but PTRACE_LISTEN breaks the
  contract. Obviusly it is very wrong to manipulate task->state if this
  task is already running, or WAKING, or it sleeps again"

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Fixes: 9899d11f ("ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never race with SIGKILL")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/xm26y3vfhmkp.fsf_-_@bsegall-linux.mtv.corp.google.comSigned-off-by: default avatarBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
parent bce3756a
......@@ -150,11 +150,17 @@ static void ptrace_unfreeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
WARN_ON(!task->ptrace || task->parent != current);
/*
* PTRACE_LISTEN can allow ptrace_trap_notify to wake us up remotely.
* Recheck state under the lock to close this race.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
if (task->state == __TASK_TRACED) {
if (__fatal_signal_pending(task))
wake_up_state(task, __TASK_TRACED);
else
task->state = TASK_TRACED;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment