Commit 4d38a87f authored by Paolo Valente's avatar Paolo Valente Committed by Jens Axboe

block, bfq: invoke flush_idle_tree after reparent_active_queues in pd_offline

In bfq_pd_offline(), the function bfq_flush_idle_tree() is invoked to
flush the rb tree that contains all idle entities belonging to the pd
(cgroup) being destroyed. In particular, bfq_flush_idle_tree() is
invoked before bfq_reparent_active_queues(). Yet the latter may happen
to add some entities to the idle tree. It happens if, in some of the
calls to bfq_bfqq_move() performed by bfq_reparent_active_queues(),
the queue to move is empty and gets expired.

This commit simply reverses the invocation order between
bfq_flush_idle_tree() and bfq_reparent_active_queues().

Tested-by: cki-project@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 576682fa
...@@ -893,13 +893,6 @@ static void bfq_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd) ...@@ -893,13 +893,6 @@ static void bfq_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
for (i = 0; i < BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES; i++) { for (i = 0; i < BFQ_IOPRIO_CLASSES; i++) {
st = bfqg->sched_data.service_tree + i; st = bfqg->sched_data.service_tree + i;
/*
* The idle tree may still contain bfq_queues belonging
* to exited task because they never migrated to a different
* cgroup from the one being destroyed now.
*/
bfq_flush_idle_tree(st);
/* /*
* It may happen that some queues are still active * It may happen that some queues are still active
* (busy) upon group destruction (if the corresponding * (busy) upon group destruction (if the corresponding
...@@ -913,6 +906,19 @@ static void bfq_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd) ...@@ -913,6 +906,19 @@ static void bfq_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
* scheduler has taken no reference. * scheduler has taken no reference.
*/ */
bfq_reparent_active_queues(bfqd, bfqg, st, i); bfq_reparent_active_queues(bfqd, bfqg, st, i);
/*
* The idle tree may still contain bfq_queues
* belonging to exited task because they never
* migrated to a different cgroup from the one being
* destroyed now. In addition, even
* bfq_reparent_active_queues() may happen to add some
* entities to the idle tree. It happens if, in some
* of the calls to bfq_bfqq_move() performed by
* bfq_reparent_active_queues(), the queue to move is
* empty and gets expired.
*/
bfq_flush_idle_tree(st);
} }
__bfq_deactivate_entity(entity, false); __bfq_deactivate_entity(entity, false);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment