Commit 5405d005 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

posix-cpu-timers: Remove pointless return value check

set_process_cpu_timer() checks already whether the clock id is valid. No
point in checking the return value of the sample function. That allows to
simplify the sample function later.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190821192920.339725769@linutronix.de
parent da020ce4
...@@ -1190,14 +1190,13 @@ void set_process_cpu_timer(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int clock_idx, ...@@ -1190,14 +1190,13 @@ void set_process_cpu_timer(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int clock_idx,
u64 *newval, u64 *oldval) u64 *newval, u64 *oldval)
{ {
u64 now; u64 now;
int ret;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(clock_idx >= CPUCLOCK_SCHED)) if (WARN_ON_ONCE(clock_idx >= CPUCLOCK_SCHED))
return; return;
ret = cpu_clock_sample_group(clock_idx, tsk, &now, true); cpu_clock_sample_group(clock_idx, tsk, &now, true);
if (oldval && ret != -EINVAL) { if (oldval) {
/* /*
* We are setting itimer. The *oldval is absolute and we update * We are setting itimer. The *oldval is absolute and we update
* it to be relative, *newval argument is relative and we update * it to be relative, *newval argument is relative and we update
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment