drm/nouveau: Remove unnecessary VCPI checks in nv50_msto_cleanup()

There is no need to look at the port's VCPI allocation before calling
drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(), as we already have msto->disabled to let
us avoid cleaning up an msto more then once. The DP MST core will never
call drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi() on it's own, which is presumably what
these checks are meant to protect against.

More importantly though, we're about to stop clearing mstc->port in the
next commit, which means if we could potentially hit a use-after-free
error if we tried to check mstc->port->vcpi here. So to make life easier
for anyone who bisects this code in the future, use msto->disabled
instead to check whether or not we need to deallocate VCPI instead.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerry Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190111005343.17443-14-lyude@redhat.com

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c

@@ -696,14 +696,17 @@ nv50_msto_cleanup(struct nv50_msto *msto)
 	struct nv50_mstc *mstc = msto->mstc;
 	struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm;
 
+	if (!msto->disabled)
+		return;
+
 	NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto cleanup\n", msto->encoder.name);
-	if (mstc->port && mstc->port->vcpi.vcpi > 0 && !nv50_msto_payload(msto))
+
+	if (mstc->port)
 		drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(&mstm->mgr, mstc->port);
-	if (msto->disabled) {
+
 	msto->mstc = NULL;
 	msto->head = NULL;
 	msto->disabled = false;
-	}
 }
 
 static void