Commit 5f81b1f5 authored by Florian Westphal's avatar Florian Westphal Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

netfilter: nat: fix src map lookup

commit 97772bcd upstream.

When doing initial conversion to rhashtable I replaced the bucket
walk with a single rhashtable_lookup_fast().

When moving to rhlist I failed to properly walk the list of identical
tuples, but that is what is needed for this to work correctly.
The table contains the original tuples, so the reply tuples are all
distinct.

We currently decide that mapping is (not) in range only based on the
first entry, but in case its not we need to try the reply tuple of the
next entry until we either find an in-range mapping or we checked
all the entries.

This bug makes nat core attempt collision resolution while it might be
able to use the mapping as-is.

Fixes: 870190a9 ("netfilter: nat: convert nat bysrc hash to rhashtable")
Reported-by: default avatarJaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
Tested-by: default avatarJaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 090911a2
...@@ -225,20 +225,21 @@ find_appropriate_src(struct net *net, ...@@ -225,20 +225,21 @@ find_appropriate_src(struct net *net,
.tuple = tuple, .tuple = tuple,
.zone = zone .zone = zone
}; };
struct rhlist_head *hl; struct rhlist_head *hl, *h;
hl = rhltable_lookup(&nf_nat_bysource_table, &key, hl = rhltable_lookup(&nf_nat_bysource_table, &key,
nf_nat_bysource_params); nf_nat_bysource_params);
if (!hl)
return 0;
ct = container_of(hl, typeof(*ct), nat_bysource);
rhl_for_each_entry_rcu(ct, h, hl, nat_bysource) {
nf_ct_invert_tuplepr(result, nf_ct_invert_tuplepr(result,
&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple); &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple);
result->dst = tuple->dst; result->dst = tuple->dst;
return in_range(l3proto, l4proto, result, range); if (in_range(l3proto, l4proto, result, range))
return 1;
}
return 0;
} }
/* For [FUTURE] fragmentation handling, we want the least-used /* For [FUTURE] fragmentation handling, we want the least-used
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment