Commit 60f8a59d authored by Sudip Mukherjee's avatar Sudip Mukherjee Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

parport: daisy: use new parport device model

Modify parport daisy driver to use the new parallel port device model.

Last attempt was '1aec4211 ("parport: daisy: use new parport device
model")' which failed as daisy was also trying to load the low level
driver and that resulted in a deadlock.

Cc: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191016144540.18810-4-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 231ec2f2
...@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static struct daisydev { ...@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static struct daisydev {
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(topology_lock); static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(topology_lock);
static int numdevs; static int numdevs;
static bool daisy_init_done;
/* Forward-declaration of lower-level functions. */ /* Forward-declaration of lower-level functions. */
static int mux_present(struct parport *port); static int mux_present(struct parport *port);
...@@ -87,6 +88,24 @@ static struct parport *clone_parport(struct parport *real, int muxport) ...@@ -87,6 +88,24 @@ static struct parport *clone_parport(struct parport *real, int muxport)
return extra; return extra;
} }
static int daisy_drv_probe(struct pardevice *par_dev)
{
struct device_driver *drv = par_dev->dev.driver;
if (strcmp(drv->name, "daisy_drv"))
return -ENODEV;
if (strcmp(par_dev->name, daisy_dev_name))
return -ENODEV;
return 0;
}
static struct parport_driver daisy_driver = {
.name = "daisy_drv",
.probe = daisy_drv_probe,
.devmodel = true,
};
/* Discover the IEEE1284.3 topology on a port -- muxes and daisy chains. /* Discover the IEEE1284.3 topology on a port -- muxes and daisy chains.
* Return value is number of devices actually detected. */ * Return value is number of devices actually detected. */
int parport_daisy_init(struct parport *port) int parport_daisy_init(struct parport *port)
...@@ -98,6 +117,23 @@ int parport_daisy_init(struct parport *port) ...@@ -98,6 +117,23 @@ int parport_daisy_init(struct parport *port)
int i; int i;
int last_try = 0; int last_try = 0;
if (!daisy_init_done) {
/*
* flag should be marked true first as
* parport_register_driver() might try to load the low
* level driver which will lead to announcing new ports
* and which will again come back here at
* parport_daisy_init()
*/
daisy_init_done = true;
i = parport_register_driver(&daisy_driver);
if (i) {
pr_err("daisy registration failed\n");
daisy_init_done = false;
return i;
}
}
again: again:
/* Because this is called before any other devices exist, /* Because this is called before any other devices exist,
* we don't have to claim exclusive access. */ * we don't have to claim exclusive access. */
...@@ -213,10 +249,12 @@ void parport_daisy_fini(struct parport *port) ...@@ -213,10 +249,12 @@ void parport_daisy_fini(struct parport *port)
struct pardevice *parport_open(int devnum, const char *name) struct pardevice *parport_open(int devnum, const char *name)
{ {
struct daisydev *p = topology; struct daisydev *p = topology;
struct pardev_cb par_cb;
struct parport *port; struct parport *port;
struct pardevice *dev; struct pardevice *dev;
int daisy; int daisy;
memset(&par_cb, 0, sizeof(par_cb));
spin_lock(&topology_lock); spin_lock(&topology_lock);
while (p && p->devnum != devnum) while (p && p->devnum != devnum)
p = p->next; p = p->next;
...@@ -230,7 +268,7 @@ struct pardevice *parport_open(int devnum, const char *name) ...@@ -230,7 +268,7 @@ struct pardevice *parport_open(int devnum, const char *name)
port = parport_get_port(p->port); port = parport_get_port(p->port);
spin_unlock(&topology_lock); spin_unlock(&topology_lock);
dev = parport_register_device(port, name, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL); dev = parport_register_dev_model(port, name, &par_cb, devnum);
parport_put_port(port); parport_put_port(port);
if (!dev) if (!dev)
return NULL; return NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment