Commit 692927f4 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915: Reinstate an early latency==0 check for skl+

I thought we could remove all the early latency==0 checks
and rely on skl_wm_method{1,2}() checking for it. But
skl_compute_plane_wm() applies a bunch of workarounds to bump
up the latency before calling those guys so clearly it won't
end up doing the right thing. Also not sure if the calculations
based on the method1/2 results are safe agaisnt overflows so
it might not work all that well in any case. Let's put the
early check back.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181221171436.8218-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
parent b52c273b
...@@ -4700,6 +4700,9 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, ...@@ -4700,6 +4700,9 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
to_intel_atomic_state(cstate->base.state); to_intel_atomic_state(cstate->base.state);
bool apply_memory_bw_wa = skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(state); bool apply_memory_bw_wa = skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(state);
if (latency == 0)
return;
/* Display WA #1141: kbl,cfl */ /* Display WA #1141: kbl,cfl */
if ((IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_COFFEELAKE(dev_priv) || if ((IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_COFFEELAKE(dev_priv) ||
IS_CNL_REVID(dev_priv, CNL_REVID_A0, CNL_REVID_B0)) && IS_CNL_REVID(dev_priv, CNL_REVID_A0, CNL_REVID_B0)) &&
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment