Commit 7b08d618 authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds

Merge branch 'locking-urgent-for-linus.patch' of...

Merge branch 'locking-urgent-for-linus.patch' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull rtmutex fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "Another three patches to make the rtmutex code more robust.  That's
  the last urgent fallout from the big futex/rtmutex investigation"

* 'locking-urgent-for-linus.patch' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  rtmutex: Plug slow unlock race
  rtmutex: Detect changes in the pi lock chain
  rtmutex: Handle deadlock detection smarter
parents 7a8e9c80 27e35715
......@@ -31,3 +31,8 @@ static inline int debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
{
return (waiter != NULL);
}
static inline void rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
{
debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w);
}
......@@ -83,6 +83,47 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
owner = *p;
} while (cmpxchg(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
}
/*
* Safe fastpath aware unlock:
* 1) Clear the waiters bit
* 2) Drop lock->wait_lock
* 3) Try to unlock the lock with cmpxchg
*/
static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
__releases(lock->wait_lock)
{
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
/*
* If a new waiter comes in between the unlock and the cmpxchg
* we have two situations:
*
* unlock(wait_lock);
* lock(wait_lock);
* cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) == owner
* mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
* acquire(lock);
* or:
*
* unlock(wait_lock);
* lock(wait_lock);
* mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
*
* cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) != owner
* enqueue_waiter();
* unlock(wait_lock);
* lock(wait_lock);
* wake waiter();
* unlock(wait_lock);
* lock(wait_lock);
* acquire(lock);
*/
return rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, owner, NULL);
}
#else
# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (0)
static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
......@@ -90,6 +131,17 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)
((unsigned long)lock->owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
}
/*
* Simple slow path only version: lock->owner is protected by lock->wait_lock.
*/
static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
__releases(lock->wait_lock)
{
lock->owner = NULL;
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
return true;
}
#endif
static inline int
......@@ -260,16 +312,24 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
*/
int max_lock_depth = 1024;
static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p)
{
return p->pi_blocked_on ? p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL;
}
/*
* Adjust the priority chain. Also used for deadlock detection.
* Decreases task's usage by one - may thus free the task.
*
* @task: the task owning the mutex (owner) for which a chain walk is probably
* needed
* @task: the task owning the mutex (owner) for which a chain walk is
* probably needed
* @deadlock_detect: do we have to carry out deadlock detection?
* @orig_lock: the mutex (can be NULL if we are walking the chain to recheck
* things for a task that has just got its priority adjusted, and
* is waiting on a mutex)
* @next_lock: the mutex on which the owner of @orig_lock was blocked before
* we dropped its pi_lock. Is never dereferenced, only used for
* comparison to detect lock chain changes.
* @orig_waiter: rt_mutex_waiter struct for the task that has just donated
* its priority to the mutex owner (can be NULL in the case
* depicted above or if the top waiter is gone away and we are
......@@ -281,6 +341,7 @@ int max_lock_depth = 1024;
static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
int deadlock_detect,
struct rt_mutex *orig_lock,
struct rt_mutex *next_lock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
struct task_struct *top_task)
{
......@@ -314,7 +375,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
}
put_task_struct(task);
return deadlock_detect ? -EDEADLK : 0;
return -EDEADLK;
}
retry:
/*
......@@ -338,6 +399,18 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
if (orig_waiter && !rt_mutex_owner(orig_lock))
goto out_unlock_pi;
/*
* We dropped all locks after taking a refcount on @task, so
* the task might have moved on in the lock chain or even left
* the chain completely and blocks now on an unrelated lock or
* on @orig_lock.
*
* We stored the lock on which @task was blocked in @next_lock,
* so we can detect the chain change.
*/
if (next_lock != waiter->lock)
goto out_unlock_pi;
/*
* Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note,
* top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
......@@ -377,7 +450,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
ret = deadlock_detect ? -EDEADLK : 0;
ret = -EDEADLK;
goto out_unlock_pi;
}
......@@ -422,11 +495,26 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
}
/*
* Check whether the task which owns the current lock is pi
* blocked itself. If yes we store a pointer to the lock for
* the lock chain change detection above. After we dropped
* task->pi_lock next_lock cannot be dereferenced anymore.
*/
next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
/*
* We reached the end of the lock chain. Stop right here. No
* point to go back just to figure that out.
*/
if (!next_lock)
goto out_put_task;
if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter)
goto out_put_task;
......@@ -536,8 +624,9 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
{
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter;
unsigned long flags;
struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
int chain_walk = 0, res;
unsigned long flags;
/*
* Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to
......@@ -548,7 +637,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
* which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock
* situation.
*/
if (detect_deadlock && owner == task)
if (owner == task)
return -EDEADLK;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
......@@ -569,20 +658,28 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
if (!owner)
return 0;
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter);
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter);
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
chain_walk = 1;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
}
else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock))
} else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock)) {
chain_walk = 1;
}
if (!chain_walk)
/* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */
next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
/*
* Even if full deadlock detection is on, if the owner is not
* blocked itself, we can avoid finding this out in the chain
* walk.
*/
if (!chain_walk || !next_lock)
return 0;
/*
......@@ -594,8 +691,8 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock, waiter,
task);
res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock,
next_lock, waiter, task);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
......@@ -605,7 +702,8 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
/*
* Wake up the next waiter on the lock.
*
* Remove the top waiter from the current tasks waiter list and wake it up.
* Remove the top waiter from the current tasks pi waiter list and
* wake it up.
*
* Called with lock->wait_lock held.
*/
......@@ -626,10 +724,23 @@ static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
*/
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
/*
* As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays
* queued on the lock until it gets the lock, this lock
* obviously has waiters. Just set the bit here and this has
* the added benefit of forcing all new tasks into the
* slow path making sure no task of lower priority than
* the top waiter can steal this lock.
*/
lock->owner = (void *) RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->pi_lock, flags);
/*
* It's safe to dereference waiter as it cannot go away as
* long as we hold lock->wait_lock. The waiter task needs to
* acquire it in order to dequeue the waiter.
*/
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
}
......@@ -644,8 +755,8 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
{
int first = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
struct rt_mutex *next_lock = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
int chain_walk = 0;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&current->pi_lock, flags);
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
......@@ -669,13 +780,13 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
}
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
chain_walk = 1;
/* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */
next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
}
if (!chain_walk)
if (!next_lock)
return;
/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
......@@ -683,7 +794,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, NULL, current);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, next_lock, NULL, current);
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
}
......@@ -696,6 +807,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
{
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
......@@ -706,12 +818,13 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
return;
}
next_lock = waiter->lock;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
get_task_struct(task);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, NULL, task);
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, next_lock, NULL, task);
}
/**
......@@ -763,6 +876,26 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
return ret;
}
static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
{
/*
* If the result is not -EDEADLOCK or the caller requested
* deadlock detection, nothing to do here.
*/
if (res != -EDEADLOCK || detect_deadlock)
return;
/*
* Yell lowdly and stop the task right here.
*/
rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w);
while (1) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule();
}
}
/*
* Slow path lock function:
*/
......@@ -802,8 +935,10 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
if (unlikely(ret))
if (unlikely(ret)) {
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, detect_deadlock, &waiter);
}
/*
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit
......@@ -859,12 +994,49 @@ rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
lock->owner = NULL;
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
/*
* We must be careful here if the fast path is enabled. If we
* have no waiters queued we cannot set owner to NULL here
* because of:
*
* foo->lock->owner = NULL;
* rtmutex_lock(foo->lock); <- fast path
* free = atomic_dec_and_test(foo->refcnt);
* rtmutex_unlock(foo->lock); <- fast path
* if (free)
* kfree(foo);
* raw_spin_unlock(foo->lock->wait_lock);
*
* So for the fastpath enabled kernel:
*
* Nothing can set the waiters bit as long as we hold
* lock->wait_lock. So we do the following sequence:
*
* owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
* clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
* raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
* if (cmpxchg(&lock->owner, owner, 0) == owner)
* return;
* goto retry;
*
* The fastpath disabled variant is simple as all access to
* lock->owner is serialized by lock->wait_lock:
*
* lock->owner = NULL;
* raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
*/
while (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
/* Drops lock->wait_lock ! */
if (unlock_rt_mutex_safe(lock) == true)
return;
/* Relock the rtmutex and try again */
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
}
/*
* The wakeup next waiter path does not suffer from the above
* race. See the comments there.
*/
wakeup_next_waiter(lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
......@@ -1112,7 +1284,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
return 1;
}
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, 1);
if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
/*
......
......@@ -24,3 +24,8 @@
#define debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w) do { } while (0)
#define debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(w,d) (d)
#define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) do { } while (0)
static inline void rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
{
WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n");
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment