Commit 7f0431e3 authored by Toshi Kani's avatar Toshi Kani Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/mm/mtrr: Fix MTRR lookup to handle an inclusive entry

When an MTRR entry is inclusive to a requested range, i.e. the
start and end of the request are not within the MTRR entry range
but the range contains the MTRR entry entirely:

  range_start ... [mtrr_start ... mtrr_end] ... range_end

__mtrr_type_lookup() ignores such a case because both
start_state and end_state are set to zero.

This bug can cause the following issues:

1) reserve_memtype() tracks an effective memory type in case
   a request type is WB (ex. /dev/mem blindly uses WB). Missing
   to track with its effective type causes a subsequent request
   to map the same range with the effective type to fail.

2) pud_set_huge() and pmd_set_huge() check if a requested range
   has any overlap with MTRRs. Missing to detect an overlap may
   cause a performance penalty or undefined behavior.

This patch fixes the bug by adding a new flag, 'inclusive',
to detect the inclusive case.  This case is then handled in
the same way as end_state:1 since the first region is the same.
With this fix, __mtrr_type_lookup() handles the inclusive case
properly.
Signed-off-by: default avatarToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Elliott@hp.com
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: pebolle@tiscali.nl
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431714237-880-3-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432628901-18044-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 10455f64
...@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end, int *repeat) ...@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end, int *repeat)
prev_match = 0xFF; prev_match = 0xFF;
for (i = 0; i < num_var_ranges; ++i) { for (i = 0; i < num_var_ranges; ++i) {
unsigned short start_state, end_state; unsigned short start_state, end_state, inclusive;
if (!(mtrr_state.var_ranges[i].mask_lo & (1 << 11))) if (!(mtrr_state.var_ranges[i].mask_lo & (1 << 11)))
continue; continue;
...@@ -166,19 +166,27 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end, int *repeat) ...@@ -166,19 +166,27 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end, int *repeat)
start_state = ((start & mask) == (base & mask)); start_state = ((start & mask) == (base & mask));
end_state = ((end & mask) == (base & mask)); end_state = ((end & mask) == (base & mask));
inclusive = ((start < base) && (end > base));
if (start_state != end_state) { if ((start_state != end_state) || inclusive) {
/* /*
* We have start:end spanning across an MTRR. * We have start:end spanning across an MTRR.
* We split the region into * We split the region into either
* either *
* (start:mtrr_end) (mtrr_end:end) * - start_state:1
* or * (start:mtrr_end)(mtrr_end:end)
* (start:mtrr_start) (mtrr_start:end) * - end_state:1
* (start:mtrr_start)(mtrr_start:end)
* - inclusive:1
* (start:mtrr_start)(mtrr_start:mtrr_end)(mtrr_end:end)
*
* depending on kind of overlap. * depending on kind of overlap.
* Return the type for first region and a pointer to *
* the start of second region so that caller will * Return the type of the first region and a pointer
* lookup again on the second region. * to the start of next region so that caller will be
* advised to lookup again after having adjusted start
* and end.
*
* Note: This way we handle multiple overlaps as well. * Note: This way we handle multiple overlaps as well.
*/ */
if (start_state) if (start_state)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment